Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Precision oncology: current and future platforms for treatment selection
Xinran Tang1, Michael F Berger2, David B Solit3
1Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Abstract:
Genomic profiling of hundreds of cancer-associated genes is now a component of routine cancer care. DNA sequencing can identify mutations, mutational signatures, and structural alterations predictive of therapy response and assess for heritable cancer risk, but it has been less useful for identifying predictive biomarkers of sensitivity to cytotoxic chemotherapies, antibody drug conjugates, and immunotherapies. The clinical adoption of molecular profiling platforms such as RNA sequencing better suited to identifying those patients most likely to respond to immunotherapies and drug combinations will be critical to expanding the benefits of precision oncology. This review discusses the potential advantages of innovative molecular and functional profiling platforms designed to replace or complement targeted DNA sequencing and the major hurdles to their clinical adoption.
Insights
Genomic profiling aids cancer care, but DNA sequencing has limits for predicting responses to many therapies. Innovative molecular and functional profiling platforms are crucial for advancing precision oncology.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Genomic profiling is standard in cancer care, utilizing DNA sequencing.
- DNA sequencing identifies mutations and alterations for therapy response and heritable risk.
- However, DNA sequencing is limited in predicting sensitivity to chemotherapies, antibody drug conjugates, and immunotherapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review innovative molecular and functional profiling platforms.
- To discuss their potential to complement or replace DNA sequencing.
- To identify barriers to clinical adoption.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on molecular and functional profiling platforms.
- Analysis of the utility of DNA sequencing versus other molecular profiling methods.
- Discussion of clinical adoption challenges for novel platforms.
Main Results:
- DNA sequencing is effective for certain biomarkers but not all therapy types.
- RNA sequencing and other platforms show promise for predicting immunotherapy and combination therapy response.
- Hurdles to clinical adoption include validation, cost, and integration into care.
Conclusions:
- Expanding precision oncology requires adopting advanced molecular profiling beyond DNA sequencing.
- RNA sequencing and functional platforms offer greater predictive power for specific therapies.
- Overcoming clinical adoption challenges is essential for realizing the full potential of precision oncology.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Survival Analysis

