Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
Overcoming time-varying confounding in self-controlled case series with active comparators: application and
Anna Schultze1, Jeremy Brown1,2, John Logie3
1Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Confounding by indication is a key challenge for pharmacoepidemiologists. Although self-controlled study designs address time-invariant confounding, indications sometimes vary over time. For example, infection might act as a time-varying confounder in a study of antibiotics and uveitis, because it is time-limited and a direct cause of both receipt of antibiotics and uveitis. Methods for incorporating active comparators in self-controlled studies to address such time-varying confounding by indication have only recently been developed. In this paper, we formalize these methods and provide a detailed description for how the active comparator rate ratio can be derived in a self-controlled case series: either by explicitly comparing the regression coefficients for a drug of interest and an active comparator under certain circumstances using a simple ratio approach or through the use of a nested regression model. The approaches are compared in 2 case studies, one examining the association between thiazolidinedione use and fractures and one examining the association between fluoroquinolone use and uveitis, using the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Finally, we provide recommendations for the use of these methods, which we hope will support the design, execution, and interpretation of self-controlled case series using active comparators and thereby increase the robustness of pharmacoepidemiologic studies. This article is part of a Special Collection on Pharmacoepidemiology.
More Related Videos
07:59Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
Published on: June 9, 2023
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Censoring Survival Data
Assumptions of Survival Analysis