Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.8K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

55.5K
While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
55.5K
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

74.7K
Overview
74.7K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

230.0K
Overview
230.0K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the Risk of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection After Rifaximin Treatment for Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Safety of Live Attenuated MMR, Varicella, and Yellow Fever Vaccination in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Therapy: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis.

Vaccines·2026
Same author

Doctor-Patient Communication and Sensory Disabilities among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Findings from NHATS.

Research square·2026
Same author

Colocalization of eQTLs With Type 2 Diabetes and Glycemic Traits Using Whole-Genome Sequences in Diverse Populations From the NHLBI Trans-Omics in Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Program.

Diabetes·2026
Same author

HIV tri-specific killer engagers directly enhance NK cell function and safely expand NK cells in vivo.

Cell reports. Medicine·2026
Same author

Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) contamination of nursing home staff hands and forearms when entering the breakroom or going home.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Associations Between Social Risk Factors and Acute Care Use Among Patients with Rheumatic Conditions.

Arthritis care & research·2026
Same journal

Engagement Patterns with an AI Health Coach for Systemic Sclerosis Self-Management: A Mixed Methods Study.

Arthritis care & research·2026
Same journal

Anorectal Dysfunction in Systemic Sclerosis: Clinical Phenotypes and Functional Patterns.

Arthritis care & research·2026
Same journal

Determinants of body mass index in early systemic sclerosis: implications for nutritional risk stratification.

Arthritis care & research·2026
Same journal

Frailty Predicts Incident Osteoporotic Fractures in Veterans with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Arthritis care & research·2026
Same journal

Assessing Reliability of an Electronic Gout Flare Assessment Protocol.

Arthritis care & research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K

A Guide to Understanding Mendelian Randomization Studies.

Kevin Nguyen1, Braxton D Mitchell2

  • 1University of Maryland, Baltimore.

Arthritis Care & Research
|July 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants to estimate causal effects, overcoming limitations of observational epidemiology. This review explains MR methods, assumptions, and how to evaluate study quality for reliable causal inference.

More Related Videos

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
05:51

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

25.8K
Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
05:51

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

25.8K
Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Observational epidemiology faces limitations in causal inference due to confounding and reverse causation.
  • Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a method to overcome these biases using genetic variants as instrumental variables.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a foundational understanding of Mendelian randomization (MR) studies.
  • To guide readers on how to critically evaluate the quality and validity of MR research.

Main Methods:

  • MR employs genetic variants as proxies for exposures in a natural experiment design.
  • Causal effects on outcomes are estimated, minimizing biases inherent in traditional epidemiologic studies.

Main Results:

  • MR relies on three core assumptions for valid instrument selection.
  • Adherence to these assumptions is crucial for assessing the credibility of causal estimates.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding MR methodology and its underlying assumptions is essential for interpreting results.
  • This review equips readers with the knowledge to assess the quality of MR studies and their causal inferences.