Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure
Published on: February 8, 2022
Who Should Undergo Chronic Total Occlusions Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and When?: An Evidence-Based Approach
Kevin Soriano1, Ginger Y Jiang1, Lauren Balkan1
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Insights
Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve angina but doesn't reduce heart attack or death risks. Patient selection for CTO PCI requires careful risk-benefit analysis.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Chronic total occlusions (CTO) are prevalent in cardiac catheterization patients, associated with poorer prognoses.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTOs shows promise for symptom relief but lacks definitive evidence for reducing major adverse cardiac events.
- CTO PCI presents higher risks and lower success rates than non-CTO PCI, necessitating careful patient selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current data on CTO PCI outcomes, including clinical results and procedural risks.
- To evaluate the role of preprocedural ischemia testing in guiding CTO PCI decisions.
- To present an approach for managing patients referred for CTO PCI, emphasizing risk-benefit assessment.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of existing literature on CTO PCI.
- Analysis of clinical outcomes, including symptom improvement, myocardial infarction, and mortality.
- Evaluation of preprocedural ischemia testing strategies.
- Review of procedural success and risk stratification scores.
Main Results:
- CTO PCI has demonstrated improvements in anginal symptoms in observational and limited randomized studies.
- Evidence does not yet confirm a reduction in myocardial infarction or death rates with CTO PCI.
- CTO PCI remains technically challenging with higher risks and lower success rates compared to non-CTO PCI.
Conclusions:
- Deciding on CTO PCI requires a thorough risk-benefit analysis and patient discussion.
- Preprocedural ischemia testing and risk stratification scores aid in patient selection for CTO PCI.
- A structured approach is essential for optimizing outcomes in patients undergoing CTO PCI.
Abstract:
Chronic total occlusions (CTO) of the coronary arteries are common among patients presenting to the cardiac catheterization laboratory, and data suggests a worse overall prognosis in patients with CTOs. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of CTOs has been shown to improve anginal symptoms in observational studies and in a limited number of randomized trials. However, CTO PCI has not been shown to lead to a reduction in other important end points such as myocardial infarction or death. Furthermore, despite recent advances in the field, CTO PCI still carries higher risks and a lower likelihood of success compared with non-CTO PCI. Thus, determining which patients may be appropriate for CTO PCI is challenging and must involve a comprehensive risk-benefit analysis and discussion with the patient. Therefore, we review the currently available data regarding CTO PCI, including the clinical outcomes, the role of preprocedural ischemia testing, and various procedural success and risk stratification scores. Finally, we present our approach to the patient referred for CTO PCI.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care