Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

10:07
Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact
Published on: February 10, 2015
19.2K
Shoulder Motion Overestimated by Mallet Scores
Madison Lovette1, Ross S Chafetz2, Stephanie A Russo3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH.
Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics
|July 22, 2024
Summary
Clinical Mallet scores for brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI) show significant inaccuracies, especially for external rotation and hand-to-mouth movements. Motion capture analysis revealed discrepancies, highlighting the need for improved assessment methods in pediatric care.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Orthopedics
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI) affect up to 4.6 per 1000 live births, commonly causing shoulder weakness and contractures.
- The modified Mallet classification is standard for assessing upper extremity motion deficits in children with BPBI.
- Accurate assessment is crucial for guiding surgical interventions and evaluating treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of Mallet classification scores for abduction, external rotation, and hand-to-mouth positions in children with BPBI.
- To compare clinical Mallet scores with objective measurements obtained via motion capture technology.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 107 children with BPBI who had concurrent motion capture and Mallet scoring.
- Motion capture determined humerothoracic elevation and external rotation angles.
- Clinical Mallet scores were compared against motion capture-derived scores to identify discrepancies.
Main Results:
- Clinical abduction Mallet scores were misclassified in 24.3% of cases.
- External rotation Mallet scores showed higher inaccuracy, with 72.9% misclassified.
- Discrepancies were more pronounced in external rotation and hand-to-mouth assessments compared to abduction.
Conclusions:
- Significant inaccuracies exist in clinically applied Mallet scores for BPBI, particularly for external rotation and hand-to-mouth.
- Complex compensatory movements may contribute to the observed discrepancies.
- The unreliability of current clinical assessments is concerning for surgical decision-making and outcome tracking.

