Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Quantification of Heavy Metals and Other Inorganic Contaminants on the Productivity of Microalgae
Published on: July 10, 2015
Heavy metal concentrations in drinking water sources in two mining districts in Ghana
Juliet Ewool1, Emmanuel R Blankson1, Jones Kpakpa Quartey1
1Department of Animal Biology and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Abstract:
- In Ghana, mining of minerals at small-scale and large-scale is widespread across many districts, leading to significant heavy metal pollution in the environment. In this study, the concentrations of iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), and mercury (Hg) in the different drinking water samples collected from households, institutions, water points and surface water in two mining districts namely the Wassa East and Asutifi North were analyzed. The water types collected included boreholes, wells, piped water into yards, public standpipes, rainwater, sachet water, and surface water. The results indicated that the levels of Fe and Mn were higher than As and Hg in all the drinking water samples. The levels of As and Hg in drinking water from households and institutions were higher in the Wassa East district compared to the Asutifi North district. However, the metal levels at water points were similar in both districts. In surface water, Fe levels were higher in the Wassa East district compared to the Asutifi North district with median values of 1243 μg/L and 860 μg/L for the Wassa East and Asutifi North districts, respectively. In contrast, the Mn levels were higher in the Asutifi North district than the Wassa East district with median values of 9.5 μg/L and 90 μg/L for Wassa East and Asutifi North districts, respectively. All the metals (Mn, As, and Hg) studied except Fe were within the recommended WHO level. The Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI) values for the different water types in households, institutions and water points were all below the critical limit of 100. The Water Quality Index (WQI) indicates that the boreholes, piped water into yards, and public standpipes in both districts were classified as excellent or good, making them suitable for drinking. However, the wells and surface water in both districts were classified as very poor and unfit for drinking, respectively.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Periodic Table and Organismal Elements
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...

