Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
Medical education during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: an umbrella review
Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi1,2, Zohreh Khoshgoftar1, Asra Fazlollahi3,4
1Department of Medical Education, School of Medical Education and Learning Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Insights
The COVID-19 pandemic impacted medical education, with online learning showing over 50% satisfaction despite drawbacks. Reduced clinical exposure and satisfaction for students were noted, requiring more high-quality reviews.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Public Health
- Digital Learning
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered lifestyles and medical education globally.
- This study provides an overview of systematic reviews examining the pandemic's impact on medical education.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education.
- To synthesize findings from systematic reviews on this topic.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, Google Scholar, medRxiv).
- Keywords included "COVID-19," "Medical Education," "E-learning," "Distance Education," "Online Learning," "Virtual Education," "systematic review," and "meta-analysis" up to April 2023.
- Quality assessment of included systematic reviews was performed using the AMSTAR-2 checklist.
Main Results:
- Twenty-eight systematic reviews were included, analyzing data from 897 to 139,381 participants.
- Technology-enhanced and simulation-based learning were prevalent strategies.
- Online learning reported over 50% satisfaction, with positive perceptions of acceptability and engagement, but faced challenges like technical difficulties and reduced student involvement.
- The quality of most included reviews was critically low or low.
Conclusions:
- Medical students experienced decreased clinical exposure and satisfaction during the pandemic.
- There is a need for higher-quality systematic reviews to better understand the long-term effects of pandemic-related changes in medical education.
Background:
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected many aspects of lifestyle and medical education during the recent years. We aimed to determine the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on medical education to provide an overview of systematic reviews on it.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and medRxiv, with the following keywords: "SARS-CoV-2," "COVID-19," "Medical Education," "E-learning," "Distance Education," "Online Learning," "Virtual Education," "systematic review," and "meta-analysis," up to 15 April 2023. Studies were included if they were systematic reviews assessing the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical sciences students. We used A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) checklist for quality assessment.
Results:
A total of 28 systematic reviews were included. The eligible reviews included between five and 64 primary studies, ranging from 897 to 139,381 participants. Technology-enhanced learning and simulation-based learning were the most frequently used strategies. Virtual teaching has several drawbacks like technical difficulties, confidentiality problems, lower student involvement, connection problems, and digital fatigue. The overall satisfaction rate for online learning was above 50%. Also, favorable opinions about perception, acceptability, motivation, and engagement were reported. The quality of 27 studies were critically low and one was low.
Conclusion:
There were reduced clinical exposure and satisfaction for medical students during the pandemic. Further high-quality systematic reviews are required.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...

