Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Change in left ventricular function and outcomes following high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with
Serdar Farhan1, Michael Freilich2, Gennaro Giustino1
1The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Insights
High-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HRPCI) supported by Impella can improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in over 40% of patients. However, LVEF improvement did not significantly alter 1-year adverse cardiovascular outcomes in this study.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- High-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HRPCI) offer a treatment option for patients with coronary artery disease and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
- The impact of HRPCI on LVEF improvement and subsequent clinical outcomes remains incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence and predictors of LVEF improvement after Impella-guided HRPCI.
- To compare clinical outcomes between patients with and without LVEF improvement post-intervention.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing Impella-guided HRPCI from a single-center registry.
- LVEF improvement was defined as an absolute increase of ≥10% at ≥30 days post-intervention.
- The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization within 1 year.
Main Results:
- Over 40% of patients (70/161) achieved LVEF improvement (25.1% to 33.3%).
- Factors associated with no LVEF improvement included prior myocardial infarction, Q-waves on ECG, and higher SYNTAX scores.
- One-year adverse cardiovascular event rates were similar in patients with and without LVEF improvement (34.9% vs. 38.3%).
Conclusions:
- LVEF improvement is achievable in a significant proportion of patients undergoing Impella-guided HRPCI.
- History of MI, ECG Q-waves, and higher SYNTAX scores are associated with a lack of LVEF improvement.
- Further prospective studies are necessary to clarify the long-term clinical significance of LVEF improvement after HRPCI.
Introduction:
High-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HRPCI) are a potential treatment option for patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and coronary artery disease. The extent to which such intervention is coupled with improvement in LVEF and associated with favorable outcomes is unknown.
Methods:
We aimed to characterize the incidence and correlates of LVEF improvement after Impella-guided HRPCI, and compare clinical outcomes in patients with versus without LVEF improvement. Data on consecutive patients undergoing Impella-guided HRPCI from a single center registry were analyzed. LVEF-improvement was defined as an absolute increase of LVEF of ≥10% measured at ≥30-days after intervention. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization within 1-year.
Results:
Out of 161 consecutive patients undergoing Impella-guided HRPCI from June 2008 to December 2017, 43% (n = 70) demonstrated LVEF-improvement (baseline LVEF of 25.09 ± 6.19 to 33.30 ± 11.98 post intervention). Patients without LVEF-improvement had higher frequency of previous MI (61.5% vs. 37.1%, p = 0.0021), Q-waves on ECG (17.6% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.024) and higher SYNTAX scores (30.8 ± 17.6 vs. 25.2 ± 12.2; p = 0.043). After correction of these confounders by multivariable analysis, no significant differences were found regarding the composite endpoint in patients with versus without LVEF-improvement (34.9% vs. 38.3%; p = 0.48).
Discussion:
In this single-center retrospective analysis, we report the following findings. First, LVEF improvement of at least 10% was documented in over 40% of patients undergoing Impella supported high-risk PCI. Second, a history of MI, Q-waves on admission ECG, and higher baseline SYNTAX scores were independent correlates of no LVEF improvement. Third, one year rates of adverse CV events were substantial and did not vary by the presence or absence of LVEF improvement Prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to elucidate the impact of LVEF improvement on clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

