Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026
Direct Mouse Trauma/Burn Model of Heterotopic Ossification
Published on: August 6, 2015
Comparative analysis of 'functional excision' of heterotopic ossification around the hip - computed tomography (CT)
Dhanasekaran Soundarrajan1, Helawi Tewabe Fanta1, Rithika Singh1
1Department- Orthopaedics &Traumatology, Ganga hospital, 313, Mettupalayam road, Coimbatore, 641 043, India.
Purpose:
We aim to analyse and compare the efficacy of the excision of HO around the hip with and without CT-guided navigation. We also aim to compare the functional outcome between CT navigation guided versus conventional excision of HO.
Patients And Methods:
This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2015 to 2022. There were 23 patients (24 hips) in the final cohort. Intraoperative CT navigation guided excision was performed in 7 hips and conventional excision of HO was done in 17 hips. The HO was classified by Brooker's grading in radiographs. CT scan was taken preoperatively in all patients to exactly identify the volume, location and preoperative planning. The functional outcome was analysed according to Harris Hip Score (HHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) for self-ambulatory patients and improvement in the sitting or nursing care was assessed in patients mobilising with wheelchair or walker support. Any complications or recurrence noted postoperatively and in follow-up were recorded.
Results:
The mean follow-up was 41.2 months in the CT navigation-guided excision group and 55 months in the conventional excision group. According to Brooker's grading, grade IV was present in 20 hips and grade III in four hips. Twelve patients were self-ambulatory and the other 12 patients were requiring support for mobilisation. There was a significant improvement in the HHS from 21.3 ± 3.7, 18.3 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 75.2 ± 8.3, 72.2 ± 4.3 postoperatively in the CT navigation guided and conventional group respectively (p < 0.001) in the self-ambulatory group. There was one anterior wall and one partial posterior wall fracture in the conventional group. One patient in the conventional group had a deep infection and recurrence. One patient had a superficial infection and another had superficial vein thrombosis in the CT guided excision group.
Conclusion:
Intraoperative CT navigation helps to exactly localize the HO and facilitates safe excision. Functional excision of the HO leads to better nursing care and functional outcomes between both groups.
