Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair

gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair

Published on: October 6, 2014

Performance of LFSPRO TP53 germline carrier risk predictions compared to standard genetic counseling practice on

Jessica L Corredor, Elissa B Dodd-Eaton, Jacynda Woodman-Ross

Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences

|July 23, 2024

Abstract

Purpose:

Current clinical guidelines for genetic testing for Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) have many limitations, primarily the criteria don't consider detailed personal and family history information and may miss many individuals with LFS. A personalized risk assessment tool, LFSPRO, was created to estimate a proband's risk for LFS based on personal and family history information. The purpose of this study is to compare LFSPRO to existing clinical criteria to determine if LFSPRO can outperform these tools. Additionally, we gauged genetic counselors' (GCs) experience using LFSPRO for their patients.

Methods:

Between December 2021 and March 2024, GCs identified patients concerning for LFS based on the patients' personal and family history information. This information was entered into LFSPRO to predict the risk to have a pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) germline TP53 variant. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) was compared between LFSPRO and Chompret criteria. Select GCs were asked to fill out surveys regarding their experience using LFSPRO following their genetic counseling appointments.

Results:

LFSPRO's sensitivity and specificity were 0.529 and 0.781 compared to Chompret's respective 0.235 and 0.677. Additionally, LFSPRO had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.30 compared to Chompret's 0.114. LFSPRO's risk prediction was concordant with genetic testing results in 75% of probands. Eighty-one percent of GC surveys reported LFSPRO being concordant with the GC's expectations and 75% would feel comfortable sharing the results with patients.

Conclusion:

LFSPRO showed improved sensitivity and specificity compared to Chompret criteria and GCs report a positive experience with LFSPRO. LFSPRO can be used to increase access to genetic testing for patients at risk for LFS and could help healthcare providers give more direct risk assessments regarding LFS testing and management for patients.

More Related Videos

Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors

Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors

Published on: September 20, 2016

Yeast As a Chassis for Developing Functional Assays to Study Human P53

Yeast As a Chassis for Developing Functional Assays to Study Human P53

Published on: August 4, 2019

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase

Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase

Genetic polymorphisms in drug targets have emerged as critical determinants of interindividual variability in drug response and toxicity. Pharmacogenomic investigations increasingly focus on identifying these variations to personalize and optimize therapeutic interventions. A drug target may be a receptor, enzyme, or signaling protein involved in pharmacologic responses or disease-related pathways. While early pharmacogenetic studies focused primarily on drug metabolism, current research...

Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets

Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets

Advances in genomics have profoundly influenced drug discovery by increasing both the speed and accuracy of pharmaceutical development. Pharmacogenomics, which examines how genetic variation influences drug response, facilitates the identification of novel therapeutic targets and enables patient stratification for personalized treatment. These strategies contribute to improved drug efficacy, minimized adverse effects, and more efficient clinical trial design.Mapping genetic differences...

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Revised Thyroid Differentiation Score for Risk Stratification in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

JCO precision oncology·2026

Clinical Characteristics and Cancer Histories Among Breast Cancer Patients With Li-Fraumeni Syndrome From a Single Institution.

Clinical breast cancer·2026

Non-BRCA germline pathogenic variants and response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2026

Scalable subclonal reconstruction of cancer cells in DNA sequencing data using a penalized likelihood model.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Tumor cell specific total mRNA expression informed neural networks predicts cancer progression.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of BRCA Germline Mutation Carriers with Advanced Breast Cancer Treated with PARP (Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase) Inhibitors: A Single-Institution Experience.

Cancers·2026

See all related articles