Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

05:53
Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
Published on: July 24, 2013
16.6K
The Use of Frailty Scores for Screening the Surgical Risk Benefits: A Multidisciplinary Approach
Madison M Ballacchino1, Chloe C McQuestion1, Matthew S Giuca2
1Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, NY.
Annals of Surgery
|July 23, 2024
Summary
Multi-disciplinary surgical pause committees (MDSPC) improve outcomes for frail patients. Medical optimization enhanced survival, while reduced surgical invasiveness offered minimal long-term benefit.
Area of Science:
- Perioperative Medicine
- Surgical Outcomes Research
- Geriatric Surgery
Background:
- Frail patients may benefit from preoperative multidisciplinary surgical pause committees (MDSPC) to optimize surgical planning.
- Risk-benefit assessments and individualized care plans are crucial for frail patients undergoing surgery.
- Stratifying patients by frailty and resilience aids in tailoring perioperative strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of MDSPCs on perioperative planning.
- To assess the role of MDSPCs in reducing adverse postoperative events and mortality rates.
- To determine the effectiveness of different MDSPC recommendations on patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 12 years of patient data following MDSPC evaluation.
- Calculation of frailty risk assessment index (RAI) scores and survival status updates.
- Categorization of MDSPC plans: G1 (proceed), G2 (optimize medically), G3 (reduce invasiveness), G4 (non-surgical). Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves.
Main Results:
- Analysis included 404 patients (12 women, 382 men), average age 71±11 years; 87.3% ASA class III/IV.
- Higher RAI scores correlated with poorer outcomes (G3/G4 vs. G1/G2).
- Average survival: 35 months (G1/G2) vs. 18-20 months (G3/G4), P<0.001.
Conclusions:
- Medical optimization (G2) improved survival to levels comparable with proceeding directly to surgery (G1).
- Reducing surgical invasiveness (G3) provided only a short-term survival benefit, with outcomes similar to non-surgical approaches (G4) long-term.
- RAI scoring is a valuable tool for predicting surgical outcomes, particularly in critically ill patients.

