Comparing the Use of Crotaline-Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) Versus Observation in Children

Stephen Rohl1, Mark Meredith1, Tucker Anderson2

  • 1From the Department of Pediatrics-Emergency Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.

PubMed

Insights

Polyvalent antivenom did not affect hospital stay or surgery for crotaline envenomation in children. Observation versus immediate antivenom use showed similar outcomes in this regional study.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Pediatric Care

Background:

  • Crotaline envenomation management in the US lacks clear guidelines for polyvalent antivenom.
  • Two institutions with differing antivenom administration protocols were compared.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare outcomes of polyvalent antivenom administration versus observation in pediatric crotaline envenomation.
  • To test the hypothesis that delaying antivenom increases hospital length of stay and surgical interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective chart review of pediatric patients from 2009-2021 at two children's hospitals.
  • Analysis of patient demographics, treatment, bite location, and outcomes.
  • Statistical examination of differences between institutions with varying antivenom use.

Main Results:

  • 183 pediatric patients were included; copperheads were the most common snake.
  • 82% of patients at one institution received antivenom, compared to 25% at the other (P < 0.001).
  • No significant differences were found in hospital length of stay (1.5 vs 1.8 days) or surgical interventions (3.3% vs 5.0%).

Conclusions:

  • Polyvalent antivenom use did not significantly impact hospital length of stay or surgical intervention rates.
  • Findings are specific to regional snake species (Southeast US) and may be influenced by institutional practices.
  • Further research is needed to evaluate long-term effects of deferred antivenom use.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos