Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

202
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
202
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

220
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
220
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

11.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.3K
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

344
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
344
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

6.6K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.6K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

2.9K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards use of Patient-informed Relevant Outcomes (PRO) in trials of bloodstream infections: a mixed-methods study protocol (BALANCE+PRO).

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Pre-discharge neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio and lymphopenia are associated with post-hospital long-term outcomes among survivors of critical illness.

Intensive care medicine experimental·2026
Same author

Mass cytometry reveals complex neutrophil heterogeneity in patients with severe sepsis.

Intensive care medicine experimental·2026
Same author

Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Pediatric Critical Care.

Critical care explorations·2026
Same author

Patient and family experiences of sedation in an urban academic tertiary-level intensive care unit in Canada: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Corticosteroids for <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> community-acquired pneumonia: promising evidence from a randomised controlled trial.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2026
Same journal

Cohort profile: Sheyang Mini Birth Cohort Study (SMBCS).

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Quebec lung, liver and heart transplant recipients' perspectives on self-narratives and their experiences in creative writing workshops during the transplantation journey: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Impact of climatic variables on postoperative outcomes in various surgical disciplines: a systematic review.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

ADHD and cardiometabolic risk profile in adults with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal register-based study.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Understanding the impact of the follow-up period on the association between excess body weight, and cardiovascular events and mortality: a prospective cohort study of the UK Biobank.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Temporal associations between incident physical health problems/sensory impairments and challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: a population-based longitudinal cohort study of primary care in England.

BMJ open·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Core socioDemographic data variables in ICU Trials (CoDe-IT): a protocol for generating core data variables using a

Karla D Krewulak1, Fatima Sheikh2, Alya Heirali1

  • 1Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

BMJ Open
|July 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sociodemographic factors significantly impact critically ill adults

Keywords:
clinical trialsintensive & critical carestatistics & research methods

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K

Area of Science:

  • Critical care medicine
  • Health services research
  • Social determinants of health

Background:

  • Sociodemographic variables, such as gender identity and ethnoracial group, directly and indirectly influence health outcomes in critically ill adults.
  • Inconsistent and insufficient data collection of these variables in critical care studies hinders effective care and research design.
  • There is a recognized need for standardized sociodemographic measures in critical care research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a core set of data variables (CoDaV) for social determinants of health tailored for studies involving critically ill adults.
  • To establish a consensus on essential sociodemographic measures to improve data collection in critical care research.
  • To guide future research and clinical practice by providing standardized data collection recommendations.

Main Methods:

  • A scoping review will identify potential sociodemographic measures for inclusion in a modified Delphi process.
  • Knowledge users, including patients, families, clinicians, and researchers, will participate in a consensus survey.
  • A final meeting will refine the CoDaV, determine data collection granularity, and plan dissemination.

Main Results:

  • The study aims to generate a consensus-driven list of core sociodemographic variables for critical care research.
  • Identification of specific measures and recommended data collection methods will be achieved through expert and stakeholder input.
  • The developed CoDaV will address the current gap in standardized sociodemographic data in critical care.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed core data variables (CoDaV) will standardize the collection of sociodemographic information in critical care studies.
  • Implementing CoDaV will enhance the quality and comparability of research on health outcomes for critically ill adults.
  • This initiative will improve the understanding and addressing of social determinants of health in critical care settings.