Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025

07:05
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
6.0K
Cooperation and competition have same benefits but different costs
Lucia De Francesco1, Alessandro Mazza1, Matilde Sorrenti1
1Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Iscience
|July 24, 2024
Summary
Cooperation and competition both enhance performance. However, cooperation with others is a healthier way to boost performance, without the increased stress and physiological burden of competition.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Human interactions are shaped by cooperation and competition.
- These social contexts influence success across various domains.
- Cognitive interference assessments can reveal impacts of social dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine how social context (cooperation vs. competition) and opponent's ability affect performance.
- To investigate the impact on perceived stress and autonomic activity.
- To determine the optimal social context for performance enhancement.
Main Methods:
- A virtual Stroop test was used to assess cognitive interference.
- Participants engaged in cooperative and competitive scenarios.
- Performance, perceived stress, and physiological activity were measured.
Main Results:
- Cooperation with a lower performer and competition with a higher performer similarly enhanced performance.
- Competition with a more skilled opponent increased perceived stress and physiological activity.
- These effects were sustained with prolonged exposure.
Conclusions:
- Cooperation is as effective as competition for improving performance.
- Cooperation offers a healthier alternative to competition by reducing stress and physiological burden.
- Social context significantly modulates cognitive performance and well-being.
Related Concept Videos
Competition
21.5K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
21.5K
Social Exchange Theory
34.5K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.5K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
170
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
170
Production Efficiency
16.8K
Net production efficiency (NPE) is the efficiency at which organisms assimilate energy into biomass for the next trophic level. Due to low metabolic rates and less energy spent on thermoregulatory processes, the NPE of ectotherms (cold-blooded animals) is 10 times higher than endotherms (warm-blooded animals).
16.8K
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K

