Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The paradox of predictability provides a bridge between micro- and macroevolution.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2024
Same author

A Cautionary Note on "A Cautionary Note on the Use of Ornstein Uhlenbeck Models in Macroevolutionary Studies".

Systematic biology·2023
Same author

Both Diet and Sociality Affect Primate Brain-Size Evolution.

Systematic biology·2022
Same author

The developmental impacts of natural selection on human pelvic morphology.

Science advances·2022
Same author

New fossils of <i>Australopithecus sediba</i> reveal a nearly complete lower back.

eLife·2021
Same author

Patterns of recent natural selection on genetic loci associated with sexually differentiated human body size and shape phenotypes.

PLoS genetics·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

Blouch: Bayesian Linear Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Models for Comparative Hypotheses.

Mark Grabowski1,2

  • 1Research Centre for Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeocology, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parson Building, 3 Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.

Systematic Biology
|July 24, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces Blouch, a Bayesian framework for analyzing trait evolution, improving upon previous methods by incorporating prior biological knowledge. It reveals complex sexual selection pressures influencing deer antler size across different social structures.

Keywords:
StanBayesianOrnstein-Uhlenbeckadaptationphylogenetic comparative methods

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Comparative genomics
  • Phylogenetics

Background:

  • Phylogenetic relationships complicate evolutionary trait analysis.
  • Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models test adaptation and phylogenetic inertia.
  • Maximum likelihood methods limit incorporating prior biological knowledge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce Blouch, a Bayesian framework for continuous trait evolution.
  • Incorporate prior biological knowledge and measurement error into analyses.
  • Test adaptive hypotheses regarding deer antler size and social structure.

Main Methods:

  • Developed Blouch (Bayesian Linear Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Models for Comparative Hypotheses).
  • Utilized a Bayesian framework for trait evolution models.
  • Applied Blouch to an empirical dataset on deer antler size and body mass.

Main Results:

  • Blouch accurately recovers evolutionary parameters in simulations.
  • Larger deer in larger groups have larger antlers, supporting sexual selection.
  • Smallest social groups exhibit a distinct antler size-body mass scaling pattern.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian framework (Blouch) enhances trait evolution analysis.
  • Sexual selection on antler size varies with social group size in deer.
  • Alternative selective pressures may influence antler size in smaller social groups.