Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Reliability and Validity of Revised Apathy Evaluation Scale-Self in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Xinyu Qiao1, Ziqi Guan2, Fangfang Pang3
1School of Health Humanities, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Objectives:
The questionnaire Apathy Evaluation Scale-Self (AES-S) has been widely adopted globally, demonstrating high reliability and validity. However, direct translation of the AES into Chinese does not fit well into the Chinese cultural setting, so a structured and comprehensive revision is needed to obtain a high reliability and validity version of the scale.
Methods:
In this study, 436 adults aged ≥ 60 years from two communities in Beijing were assessed using a modified AES-S. The methodology included item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The scale's validity was tested using the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Reliability assessment included retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, and split-half reliability.
Results:
The modified Apathy Evaluation Scale-Self-Assessment (AES-S-C) presented a first-order four-factor structure with higher reliability and validity than the original version within the Chinese older adult community.
Conclusions:
The revised AES-S-C is more suitable for the Chinese older adults in community settings.
Clinical Implications:
This self-rated scale is suitable for screening apathy among older adults in community or nursing facilities, aiding in the identification of cognitive impairment and promoting mental health.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-Discrepancy Theory

