Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning From Medical Errors in Invasive Procedures: Current Situation and Perspectives of Improvement: A Semi-Structured Interview.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same author

Management of high-risk biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer: A GCC Delphi consensus (BEAM Panel).

Cancer treatment and research communications·2026
Same author

Synthesis and multi-technique structural characterization of trimetallic oxide nanocomposites for environmental and medicinal applications.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Safety and clinical outcomes of RefluxStop procedure: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract·2026
Same author

Testing the Possible Protective Effect of Ivermectin on Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Albino Rats: Histological and Immunohistochemical Study.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same author

Adult congenital adrenal hyperplasia presenting with severe clitoromegaly and distal vaginal stenosis: A reconstructive surgical case report.

Urology case reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

21.5K

A Comparison of Systematic, Targeted, and Combined Biopsy Using Machine Learning for Prediction of Prostate Cancer

Mostafa A Arafa1,2, Islam Omar3, Karim H Farhat1

  • 1The Cancer Research Chair, Surgery Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Medical Principles and Practice : International Journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre
|July 24, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models accurately predict prostate cancer (PCa) risk. Targeted and combined biopsy detection methods show superior performance over systematic biopsy alone for PCa diagnosis.

Keywords:
Machine learningProstate cancer riskSystematic biopsyTargeted biopsy

More Related Videos

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

6.5K
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

151

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

21.5K
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

6.5K
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

151

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis relies on various clinical factors and biopsy techniques.
  • Accurate prognostic prediction models are crucial for timely and effective PCa management.
  • Comparing machine learning (ML) model performance across different biopsy strategies is essential for optimizing detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel machine learning (ML) models for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) risk.
  • To evaluate and compare the efficacy of these ML models using systematic versus targeted biopsy detection techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 528 patients' data diagnosed with PCa from 2019-2023 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Utilized four machine learning (ML) algorithms, including Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost (XGB), for PCa prediction and classification.
  • Evaluated model performance based on factors like prostate-specific antigen (PSA), MRI findings, and biopsy type.

Main Results:

  • Age, prostate volume, PSA, BMI, mpMRI score, and lesion characteristics were significantly associated with PCa.
  • Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost (XGB) models demonstrated high accuracy in predicting PCa.
  • Models achieved superior performance (AUC 0.94-0.97) for targeted and combined biopsies compared to systematic biopsy alone.

Conclusions:

  • The Random Forest (RF) model exhibits excellent predictive capability for PCa risk, particularly with targeted and combined biopsy approaches.
  • Machine learning (ML) models show promise as screening tools to potentially reduce missed PCa diagnoses.