Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Survival Time Disparities after Palliative Care Use Among Low-Income Patients on Social Welfare Programs: A
Daisuke Nishioka1,2, Iku Kanzaki3, Ayumi Kihara4
1Department of Medical Statistics, Research & Development Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Background:
Relieving the total pain of patients with cancer and supporting their well-being throughout their lives are important roles of palliative and supportive care. Poverty may inhibit patients from receiving dignified end-of-life care; however, using social welfare services may reduce its impact on patients' end-of-life experiences. Nevertheless, no study has investigated which social welfare service could lead to favorable end-of-life experiences for patients living in poverty.
Objective:
This study aimed to describe the characteristics of users of palliative care among low-income patients and examine the difference in survival time among patients with cancer on social welfare services in a single center in Kyoto, Japan.
Design:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study.
Setting/Subjects:
We included 220 patients using Public Assistance (PA: aid minimum income and medical/long-term care), Free/Low-Cost Medical Care (FLCMC: aid only medical care), and nonwelfare-users who newly received palliative care in 2021.
Measurements:
We calculated patients' survival time from the initiation of palliative care to death. In addition, we identified patients who experienced home death.
Results:
Compared with nonusers, FLCMC beneficiaries had shorter survival times (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-5.22). No difference was observed among PA beneficiaries (aHR 1.19, 95% CI 0.49-2.87). No home death was observed among welfare service recipients.
Conclusions:
Social welfare benefits only for medical expenses may not sufficiently support dignified end-of-life care for low-income patients. Further studies are required to examine the robustness of this study considering various bio-psycho-social factors that can influence these findings, to support low-income patients with cancer on social welfare services.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Continuing Care
Assumptions of Survival Analysis

