Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025
Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
Published on: March 8, 2022
Amplitude Parameters Are Predictive of Hearing Preservation in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Intracochlear
Michael S Harris1, Kanth Koka2, Adam Thompson-Harvey1
1Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Objective:
To prospectively evaluate the association between hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CI) and intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) amplitude parameters.
Study Design:
Multi-institutional, prospective randomized clinical trial.
Setting:
Ten high-volume, tertiary care CI centers.
Patients:
Adults (n = 87) with sensorineural hearing loss meeting CI criteria (2018-2021) with audiometric thresholds of ≤80 dB HL at 500 Hz.
Methods:
Participants were randomized to CI surgery with or without audible ECochG monitoring. Electrode arrays were inserted to the full-depth marker. Hearing preservation was determined by comparing pre-CI, unaided low-frequency (125-, 250-, and 500-Hz) pure-tone average (LF-PTA) to LF-PTA at CI activation. Three ECochG amplitude parameters were analyzed: 1) insertion track patterns, 2) magnitude of ECochG amplitude change, and 3) total number of ECochG amplitude drops.
Results:
The Type CC insertion track pattern, representing corrected drops in ECochG amplitude, was seen in 76% of cases with ECochG "on," compared with 24% of cases with ECochG "off" ( p = 0.003). The magnitude of ECochG signal drop was significantly correlated with the amount of LF-PTA change pre-CI and post-CI ( p < 0.05). The mean number of amplitude drops during electrode insertion was significantly correlated with change in LF-PTA at activation and 3 months post-CI ( p ≤ 0.01).
Conclusions:
ECochG amplitude parameters during CI surgery have important prognostic utility. Higher incidence of Type CC in ECochG "on" suggests that monitoring may be useful for surgeons in order to recover the ECochG signal and preventing potentially traumatic electrode-cochlear interactions.
