Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gradually Varying Flow01:29

Gradually Varying Flow

41
Gradually varying flow (GVF) in open channels describes situations where water depth changes slowly along the channel due to factors like non-uniform bed slope, channel shape variations, or obstructions. This flow type occurs when the depth adjusts gradually to balance gravitational forces, shear forces, and energy requirements, resulting in a low rate of depth change.Characteristics of Gradually Varying FlowGVF is commonly observed in natural streams, rivers, and canals, where flow depth...
41
Levels of Use of a GIS01:29

Levels of Use of a GIS

46
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) operate across three levels of application, each representing an increasing degree of complexity: data management, analysis, and prediction. These levels reflect the expanding functionality and versatility of GIS technology in handling spatial data for diverse purposes.Data ManagementAt its foundational level, GIS serves as a tool for data management, enabling the input, storage, retrieval, and organization of spatial data. This level is often employed in...
46
Typical Model Studies01:30

Typical Model Studies

354
Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
354

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding trace-element mobilization in a redox mixing zone of a river-aquifer system: Insights from a multi-tracer Bayesian mixing framework.

Journal of contaminant hydrology·2026
Same author

National-scale prediction of arsenic, fluoride and its co-occurrence in groundwater of Mexico: Implications for drinking-water.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same author

Entropy and seasonal isotopic duality reveal the sustainability paradox of the upper Ganga River.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Hydrochemical redistribution in a stressed aquifer system: Decadal attenuation of salinity extremes and expansion of diffuse agricultural contamination across Mexico.

Journal of contaminant hydrology·2026
Same author

Delineating major and trace element hotspots in groundwater through spatial autocorrelations and a double-clustering approach: The role of geologic and anthropogenic factors.

The Science of the total environment·2026
Same author

Quantification of residual DNAPL within aquifer system using atmospheric noble gases and radon: Partitioning behavior and field application.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.0K

Advancing groundwater quality predictions: Machine learning challenges and solutions.

Juan Antonio Torres-Martínez1, Jürgen Mahlknecht1, Manish Kumar2

  • 1Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey, Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey, NL 64849, Mexico.

The Science of the Total Environment
|July 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning (ML) significantly advances groundwater quality research. However, many studies overlook crucial data preprocessing (83%) and model interpretability (15%), hindering accurate contamination prediction and sustainable management.

Keywords:
Groundwater qualityMachine learningPredictive modelingSupervised learningWater pollution indicators

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

12.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.0K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

12.9K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Data Science
  • Hydrogeology

Background:

  • Machine learning (ML) is increasingly vital for predicting and managing groundwater contamination.
  • A comprehensive review of 230 papers highlights the evolution and application of ML in environmental science.
  • Understanding current ML applications in groundwater quality research is essential for future advancements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review the advancements and challenges of ML in groundwater quality research.
  • To identify gaps in current ML methodologies, including preprocessing and interpretability.
  • To provide a framework for establishing minimum standards in ML for groundwater studies.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of 230 research papers on ML and groundwater quality.
  • Analysis of ML implementation, focusing on preprocessing, optimization, and interpretability.
  • Evaluation of reporting standards for ML algorithms and performance metrics.

Main Results:

  • A significant majority of studies (83%) neglect essential data preprocessing steps, impacting model accuracy.
  • While model optimization is common (65%), model interpretability remains low (15%).
  • Comparative evaluation of algorithms and appropriate metric selection are often insufficient for assessing model reliability.

Conclusions:

  • There is a critical need to improve methodological rigor, particularly in data preprocessing and model interpretability, in ML groundwater research.
  • Interdisciplinary collaboration and continuous innovation are necessary to fully leverage ML for sustainable groundwater management.
  • This review offers a framework to guide the development of robust ML applications in groundwater quality assessment.