Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Conversational presentation mode increases credibility judgements during information search with ChatGPT
Christine Anderl1, Stefanie H Klein2, Büsra Sarigül2
1Leibniz-Institut Für Wissensmedien (IWM), Schleichstraße 6, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. c.anderl@iwm-tuebingen.de.
Users struggle to detect inaccuracies from conversational artificial intelligence (AI) agents. Presenting information as static text significantly improves credibility assessments compared to dynamic AI interactions, highlighting the impact of presentation mode on misinformation detection.
Area of Science:
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Information Science
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Conversational agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for information retrieval.
- Ensuring users can accurately assess the credibility of LLM-generated information is crucial due to potential factual inaccuracies.
- Understanding factors influencing user credibility judgments is essential for mitigating misinformation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how the presentation mode of information (conversational agent vs. static text) affects users' ability to detect inaccuracies.
- To compare credibility judgments across different types of conversational agents (text-based, voice-based) and a static online encyclopedia.
- To identify whether the conversational nature of LLM agents hinders accurate credibility assessment.
Main Methods:
- Conducted two preregistered experiments involving participants rating the credibility of accurate and partially inaccurate information.
- Information was presented via a dynamic text-based LLM agent, a voice-based agent, or a static text-based online encyclopedia.
- Analyzed data using mediation analysis to understand the role of conversational nature in credibility judgments.
Main Results:
- Participants were significantly better at detecting inaccuracies when information was presented as static text compared to both text-based and voice-based conversational agents.
- This effect persisted regardless of whether the information sources were branded (e.g., ChatGPT, Alexa, Wikipedia) or unbranded.
- Mediation analysis supported the hypothesis that the conversational format of LLM agents poses a threat to accurate credibility assessment.
Conclusions:
- The presentation mode of information critically influences users' ability to discern factual accuracy.
- Conversational interfaces, despite their dynamic nature, may inadvertently reduce users' critical evaluation of information.
- Future research and design should consider the impact of presentation modality on combating misinformation effectively.
More Related Videos
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
03:14Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
The Availability Heuristic
The Representativeness Heuristic
Confirmation Biases
Routes of Persuasion
Stereotype Content Model