Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Validating the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument for Intensive Care Unit-Ward Transfer Notes
Patrick G Lyons1,2, Juan C Rojas3, Alice F Bewley4
1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, and.
Background:
Physician communication failures during transfers of patients from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the general ward are common and can lead to adverse events. Efforts to improve written handoffs during these transfers are increasingly prominent, but no instruments have been developed to assess the quality of physician ICU-ward transfer notes.
Objective:
To collect validity evidence for the modified nine-item Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (mPDQI-9) for assessing ICU-ward transfer note usefulness across several hospitals.
Methods:
Twenty-four physician raters independently used the mPDQI-9 to grade 12 notes collected from three academic hospitals. A priori, we excluded the "up-to-date" and "accurate" domains, because these could not be assessed without giving the rater access to the complete patient chart. Assessments therefore used the domains "thorough," "useful," "organized," "comprehensible," "succinct," "synthesized," and "consistent." Raters scored each domain on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (low) to 5 (high). The total mPDQI-9 was the sum of these domain scores. The primary outcome was the raters' perceived clinical utility of the notes, and the primary measures of interest were criterion validity (Spearman's ρ) and interrater reliability (intraclass correlation [ICC]).
Results:
Mean mPDQI-9 scores by note ranged from 19 (SD = 5.5) to 30 (SD = 4.2). Mean note ratings did not systematically differ by rater expertise (for interaction, P = 0.15). The proportion of raters perceiving each note as independently sufficient for patient care (the primary outcome) ranged from 33% to 100% across the set of notes. We found a moderately positive correlation between mPDQI-9 ratings and raters' overall assessments of each note's clinical utility (ρ = 0.48, P < 0.001). Interrater reliability was strong; the overall ICC was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.85), and ICCs were similar among reviewer groups. Finally, Cronbach's α was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.89), indicating good internal consistency.
Conclusions:
We report moderate validity evidence for the mPDQI-9 to assess the usefulness of ICU-ward transfer notes written by internal medicine residents.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Formats for Nursing Documentation
Nursing Assessment Form:
• A nursing assessment form is a foundational document that captures detailed patient data from physical assessments and nursing histories.
• It includes patient demographics, medical history,...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE

