Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025

15:00
Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
Published on: August 18, 2023
3.3K
Evolution of leapfrog migration: A test of competition-based hypotheses.
Linus Hedh1, Juliana Dänhardt2, Anders Hedenström1
1Department of Biology, Ecology Building, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ecology
|July 26, 2024
Summary
Leapfrog migration in birds is not explained by body size or spring weather cues. Competition for wintering sites, mediated by prior occupancy, remains a plausible driver for this reversed migration pattern.
Area of Science:
- Ornithology
- Ecology
- Animal Migration
Background:
- Leapfrog migration, where breeding and wintering latitudes are reversed between populations, is a common avian phenomenon.
- Competition for resources is hypothesized as a driver, with theories involving body size, prior occupancy, and spring weather predictability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test hypotheses explaining leapfrog migration in common ringed plovers.
- To investigate the roles of body size, prior occupancy, and spring predictability in driving migration patterns.
Main Methods:
- Combined morphometric, migration, and weather data from four common ringed plover populations.
- Analyzed breeding and wintering distributions, body size variation, and arrival timing of meteorological spring.
Main Results:
- Body size did not correlate with wintering distribution or explain competitive exclusion.
- Spring predictability did not align with observed wintering ranges.
- Populations wintering in Europe arrived earlier than those in Africa.
Conclusions:
- Competitive exclusion via body size does not explain leapfrog migration.
- "Spring predictability" hypothesis is not supported by the data.
- Competitive exclusion mediated by prior occupancy remains a viable hypothesis for leapfrog migration.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Flow
35.0K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
35.0K
Limits to Natural Selection
31.2K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.2K
Genetics of Speciation
19.2K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
19.2K
Speciation Rates
21.1K
Overview
21.1K
The Evidence for Evolution
42.6K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
42.6K
Migration
7.9K
Migration is long-range, seasonal movement from one region or habitat to another. This common strategy, carried out by many different organisms around the world, is an adaptive response that typically corresponds to changes in an organism’s environment, like resource availability or climate. Migrations can involve huge groups of thousands of animals as well as single individuals traveling alone and can range from thousands of kilometers to just a few hundred meters.
7.9K

