Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
What Is Ailing Oncology Clinical Trials? Can We Fix Them?
Abhenil Mittal1, Sara Moore2, Vishal Navani3,4
1North East Cancer Center, Health Sciences North, Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM U), Sudbury, ON P3E5J1, Canada.
Abstract:
Evidence from phase three clinical trials helps shape clinical practice. However, a very small minority of patients with cancer participate in clinical trials and many trials are not completed on time due to slow accrual. Issues with restrictive eligibility criteria can severely limit the patients who can access trials, without any convincing evidence that these restrictions impact patient safety. Similarly, regulatory, organizational, and institutional hurdles can delay trial activation, ultimately making some studies irrelevant. Additional issues during trial conduct (e.g., mandatory in-person visits, central confirmation of standard biomarkers, and inflexible drug dosage modification) contribute to making trials non-patient-centric. These real-life observations from experienced clinical trialists can seem nonsensical to investigators and patients alike, who are trying to bring effective drugs to patients with cancer. In this review, we delve into these issues in detail, and discuss potential solutions to make clinical trials more accessible to patients.
Insights
Clinical trials for cancer patients face challenges like slow patient accrual and restrictive criteria, delaying drug development. This review explores solutions to improve patient access and streamline cancer clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trial Design
- Translational Research
Background:
- Phase three clinical trials are crucial for advancing cancer care and shaping clinical practice.
- Currently, a very small percentage of cancer patients participate in clinical trials, and many trials experience delays due to slow patient accrual.
- Existing trial protocols often have restrictive eligibility criteria and logistical hurdles that limit patient access and trial efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and analyze the key barriers hindering patient participation and timely completion of cancer clinical trials.
- To discuss practical solutions for enhancing patient-centricity and accessibility in clinical trial design and conduct.
- To provide insights for investigators, patients, and regulatory bodies to improve the clinical trial ecosystem for cancer therapeutics.
Main Methods:
- This review synthesizes real-world observations and experiences from clinical trialists.
- It critically examines common issues in trial design, eligibility criteria, regulatory processes, and trial conduct.
- Potential solutions are discussed based on practical challenges encountered in cancer clinical trials.
Main Results:
- Restrictive eligibility criteria limit patient access without clear safety benefits.
- Regulatory, organizational, and institutional hurdles cause significant delays in trial activation.
- Non-patient-centric trial conduct, including mandatory in-person visits and inflexible protocols, deters participation.
Conclusions:
- Addressing barriers in clinical trial design and conduct is essential for accelerating the availability of novel cancer drugs.
- Implementing patient-centric approaches and streamlining processes can significantly improve trial accrual and completion rates.
- Collaborative efforts among stakeholders are needed to make cancer clinical trials more accessible and efficient.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...

