Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
Published on: January 18, 2013
Do Moral Emotions Interact with Self-Control and Unstructured Socializing in Explaining Rule-Breaking Behavior
Sara-Marie Schön1, Monika Daseking1
1Developmental and Educational Psychology/Humanities and Social Sciences, Helmut-Schmidt-University (University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg), 22043 Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract:
Previous research has shown that moral emotions interact with self-control and unstructured socializing in explaining rule-breaking behavior. High levels of moral emotions appear to weaken the effects of both self-control and unstructured socializing, in explaining rule-breaking behavior. The current study examined whether these interactions also affect rule-breaking behavior that is explicitly committed with friends. In addition, three operationalizations of moral emotions were distinguished. Data were collected from N = 169 adolescents (54% female; mean = 14.95 years; SD = 1.7) using a self-report questionnaire battery. Results indicate that high levels of anticipated emotions in moral conflicts (AEMC) attenuate the effect of low self-control on one's own rule-breaking behavior. In contrast, high levels of both guilt- and shame-proneness enhanced the effect of unstructured socializing on one's own and rule-breaking with friends. The limitations of the study, ideas for future research, and practical implications are also discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Attribution Theory
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Social Scripts
Deindividuation
Conformity
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality

