The Role of Microbes in Surgical Decision Making for Infective Endocarditis: Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement?

Elisa Mikus1, Mariafrancesca Fiorentino1, Diego Sangiorgi1

  • 1Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy.

Microorganisms
|July 27, 2024
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Mitral valve repair versus replacement for endocarditis shows similar outcomes. Surgical strategy does not impact complications or survival, but specific bacteria pose risks. Repair is viable with complete infection eradication.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Infective Endocarditis Research
  • Valvular Heart Disease

Background:

  • Outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement for infective endocarditis remain unclear.
  • This study compares patient outcomes and investigates microbial etiology's impact.
  • Active endocarditis necessitates surgical intervention, but optimal valve strategy is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients with active endocarditis.
  • To investigate the influence of microbial etiology on the success of surgical strategies.
  • To evaluate the impact of surgical approach on mortality, complications, and long-term survival.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 251 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for active endocarditis (2010-2023).
  • Patients were divided into mitral valve repair (71) and replacement (180) groups.
  • Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline imbalances, resulting in 187 weighted patients for analysis.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant differences were observed between repair and replacement groups for early/late mortality or relapse rates post-IPTW.
  • Early mortality: 8.5% (repair) vs. 13.3% (replacement); Late mortality: 15.5% (repair) vs. 25.0% (replacement) (p > 0.05).
  • Relapse rates were similar (8.5% repair vs. 3.3% replacement), with median times of 4.0 and 6.9 months, respectively (p = 0.071).

Conclusions:

  • Surgical strategy (repair vs. replacement) for mitral endocarditis does not significantly affect major postoperative complications, mortality, or medium/long-term survival.
  • Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-negative Staphylococci are identified as risk factors for early mortality and relapse.
  • Mitral valve repair is a viable option in endocarditis when complete infection eradication is achieved, especially for Streptococcus infections, in younger patients, and after adequate antibiotic therapy (≥18 days).