Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From body hulls to musculoskeletal models: Personalized inertial parameter estimation.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Classifying mental stress from eye tracking data: deep learning approaches for out-of-the-lab conditions.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

An Approach Toward Radioiodination and Radiopharmacological Evaluation of a Carborane-Containing Analog of Indomethacin.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Exploring Attitudes Toward AI-Based Contactless Sensors in Health Among Five Stakeholder Groups: Qualitative Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Automatic Delineation of Tumor Spheroids in Microscopic Images Using Deep-Learning.

ACS measurement science au·2026
Same author

Diagnostic Twins: Exploring the Radiohybrid Concept with Iodine-123 and Lanthanum-133 for PSMA-Targeted SPECT and PET Imaging.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
06:35

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running

Published on: September 14, 2017

9.1K

Clustering Runners' Response to Different Midsole Stack Heights: A Field Study.

Jannik Koegel1,2, Stacy Huerta1, Markus Gambietz3

  • 1Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91052 Erlangen, Germany.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 27, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Runners adapt their biomechanics uniquely to different shoe stack heights, impacting running economy. Clustering these individual running patterns can help personalize footwear recommendations for enhanced performance.

Keywords:
cluster analysisprincipal component analysisrunning biomechanicsrunning shoeswearable sensor

More Related Videos

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
08:26

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Published on: July 17, 2020

6.0K
Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics
06:53

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics

Published on: February 28, 2025

398

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
06:35

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running

Published on: September 14, 2017

9.1K
Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
08:26

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Published on: July 17, 2020

6.0K
Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics
06:53

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics

Published on: February 28, 2025

398

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Sports Science
  • Footwear Technology

Background:

  • Advanced footwear with stack heights over 30 mm enhances running economy.
  • The individual physiological benefits are known, but biomechanical responses are not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the individual biomechanical responses to varying shoe stack heights.
  • To identify distinct running patterns associated with different stack heights.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-one runners completed trials with 25 mm, 35 mm, and 45 mm stack height shoes.
  • A STRYD sensor measured running variables, which were normalized to the 25 mm condition.
  • Participants were clustered into groups based on their running patterns.

Main Results:

  • Three distinct running pattern clusters emerged, driven by leg spring stiffness and vertical oscillation.
  • No significant differences in body metrics or running speed were observed between clusters.
  • Individual biomechanical adaptations varied significantly across participants.

Conclusions:

  • Runners exhibit unique biomechanical adjustments to different footwear stack heights.
  • Clustering these adaptations may facilitate personalized running shoe recommendations.
  • Understanding individual responses is key to optimizing footwear for running economy.