Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026
Robotic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: May 29, 2015
Selective complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation based on the number-of-fractionation for persistent atrial
Masahiro Mizobuchi1, Tomoki Yamashita2, Tatsushi Sato3
1Cardiovascular center, Kyoto-Katsura Hospital, 17 Yamada-Hiraocho, Nishikyo-Ku, Kyoto, 6158256, Japan. kcvc.mizobuchi@katsura.com.
Introduction:
Previous studies have suggested that the prolonged or highly fractionated electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF) are closely related to the reentrant driver regions. We hypothesized that exploration and ablation of these critical complex atrial fractionated electrograms (CFAE) may improve the outcome of persistent AF (PeAF) refractory to conventional PVI.
Methods:
A total of 73 PeAF patients with residual inducibility or failed cardioversions of AF after PVI were enrolled and underwent number-of-fractionation mapping (NFM) by counting the number of fractionations in 2.5 s at each of the points using the CARTO3 (ICL mode) and EnSite (fractionation map) systems. After NFM, selective CFAE ablation (NFM-CA) targeting the sites of the upper 40% of the counted fraction number (NF40) was performed as an additional procedure for refractory PeAF. We investigated the prognosis of these patients within 24 months after the index ablation procedure and the relationship between changes in activation patterns during the ablation procedure and their prognosis. We also performed a propensity score-matched analysis comparing these patients with historical controls (HC) to identify the optimal indications for NFM-CA.
Results:
The AF/AT free survival rate was 79.1% at 12 months and 56.7% at 24 months. Patients with AF termination or AF cycle length prolongation > 21 ms during the procedure had significantly better AF/AT-free survival rates than those without notable activation changes (87.7% vs. 69.0%, logrank p = 0.028). After propensity-matched analysis, AF/AT-free survival showed comparable results between the two groups (1 year; NFM 72.1% vs. HC 77.1%, logrank p = 0.649).
Conclusions:
NFM-CA is a versatile and less invasive adjunctive procedure for patients with PVI-refractory PeAF who showed a comparable prognosis to patients with PVI-compliant PeAF. In particular, remarkable activation changes during the procedure (AFCL prolongation > 21 ms or acute termination) suggest a favorable prognosis.
