Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025
Step By Step: Microsurgical training method combining two nonliving animal models
Published on: May 9, 2015
Synthetic Simulators for Microsurgery Training: A Systematic Review
Gianluca Sapino1, Stephanie Gonvers1, Mario Cherubino2
1From the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Background:
Microsurgery has a steep learning curve. Synthetic simulators have proven to be useful training tools for the initial learning stages, as well as being ethically sound, viable, safe, and cost-effective. The objective of this review was to determine the quality, effectiveness, and validity of these simulators as well as to assess their ability to evaluate microsurgical skills.
Methods:
A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. We searched databases (Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed) to identify original articles describing synthetic training models for microsurgery. Three reviewers evaluated articles for inclusion following predefined selection criteria. Data were extracted from full-texts of included articles.
Results:
Thirty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 38 different devices have been recorded. Microsurgical training devices offer a low-cost, fast, and consistent method to concretely quantify and assess the initial microsurgical skills of trainees using standardized exercises that can be scored by the examiner. According to the authors, the outcomes were satisfactory, with a tangible improvement in microsurgical abilities, despite the lack of a common comparison scale.
Conclusions:
Thanks to their availability, cost, and effectiveness, synthetic models are the recommended option to train basic, intermediate and advanced procedures before executing them on in vivo models.
