Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Refresh of a Clinical Skills Assessment for Physician Trainees
Elizabeth Whiting1,2,3, A Curtis Lee4, Balakrishnan R Nair5,6
1Cross College Examination Review Advisory Group, Royal Australasian College of Physicians, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Purpose:
The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) oversees physician training across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. Success in a written examination and clinical skills assessment (known as the clinical examination) at the mid-point of training is a requirement to progress from basic to advanced training. The clinical examination had evolved over many years without a review process. This paper describes the approach taken, the changes made and the evaluation undertaken as part of a formal review.
Methods:
A working party that included education experts and examiners experienced in the assessment of clinical skills was established. The purpose of the clinical examination and competencies being assessed were clarified and were linked to learning objectives. Significant changes to the marking and scoring approaches resulted in a more holistic approach to the assessment of candidate performance with greater transparency of standards. Evaluation over a 2-year period was undertaken before the adoption of the new approach in 2019.
Results:
In 2017 testing of a new marking rubric occurred during the annual examination cycle which confirmed feasibility and acceptability. The following year an extensive trial utilising the new marking rubric and a new scoring approach took place involving 1142 examiners, 880 candidates and 5280 scoresheets which led to some minor modifications to the scoring system. The final marking and scoring approaches resulted in unchanged pass rates and improved inter-rater reliability. Feedback from examiners confirmed that the new marking and scoring approaches were easier to use and enabled better feedback on performance for candidates.
Conclusion:
The refresh of the RACP clinical examination has resulted in an assessment that has clarity of purpose, is linked to learning objectives, has greater transparency of expected standards, has improved inter-rater reliability, is well accepted by examiners and enables feedback on examination performance to candidates.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
07:31A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
Published on: February 13, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Palpation
Thoracic Palpation
Thoracic palpation detects tenderness, masses, lesions, respiratory excursions, and vocal fremitus. The nurse assesses...
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...