Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Titanium vs PEO Surface-Modified Magnesium Plate Fixation in a Mandible Bone Healing Model in Sheep
Marta Turostowski1, Carsten Rendenbach1, Paulina Herzog1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of the Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany.
None:
Titanium plates are the current gold standard for fracture fixation of the mandible. Magnesium alloys such as WE43 are suitable biodegradable alternatives due to their high biocompatibility and elasticity modulus close to those of cortical bone. By surface modification, the reagibility of magnesium and thus hydrogen gas accumulation per time are further reduced, bringing plate fixation with magnesium closer to clinical application. This study aimed to compare bone healing in a monocortical mandibular fracture model in sheep with a human-standard size, magnesium-based, plasma electrolytic-oxidation (PEO) surface modified miniplate fixation system following 4 and 12 weeks. Bone healing was analyzed using micro-computed tomography and histological analysis with Movat's pentachrome and Giemsa staining. For evaluation of the tissue's osteogenic activity, polychrome fluorescent labeling was performed, and vascularization was analyzed using immunohistochemical staining for alpha-smooth muscle actin. Bone density and bone mineralization did not differ significantly between titanium and magnesium (BV/TV: T1: 8.74 ± 2.30%, M1: 6.83 ± 2.89%, p = 0.589 and T2: 71.99 ± 3.13%, M2: 68.58 ± 3.74%, p = 0.394; MinB: T1: 26.16 ± 9.21%, M1: 22.15 ± 7.99%, p = 0.818 and T2: 77.56 ± 3.61%, M2: 79.06 ± 4.46%, p = 0.699). After 12 weeks, minor differences were observed regarding bone microstructure, osteogenic activity, and vascularization. There was significance with regard to bone microstructure (TrTh: T2: 0.08 ± 0.01 mm, M2: 0.06 ± 0.01 mm; p = 0.041). Nevertheless, these differences did not interfere with bone healing. In this study, adequate bone healing was observed in both groups. Only after 12 weeks were some differences detected with larger trabecular spacing and more vessel density in magnesium vs titanium plates. However, a longer observational time with full resorption of the implants should be targeted in future investigations.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Structure
Bone Remodeling
Bones of the Lower Limb: Femur and Patella
Bones of the Lower Limb: Tibia and Fibula
Bone Remodeling and Repair

