Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
The impact of a digital guideline version on schizophrenia guideline knowledge: results from a multicenter
Theresa Halms1, Gabriele Gaigl2, Carolin Lorenz3
1Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Augsburg, Medical Faculty, BKH Augsburg, Geschwister-Schönert-Str. 1, Augsburg, 86156, Germany. Theresa.Halms@med.uni-augsburg.de.
Background:
Clinical practice guidelines are crucial for enhancing healthcare quality and patient outcomes. Yet, their implementation remains inconsistent across various professions and disciplines. Previous findings on the implementation of the German guideline for schizophrenia (2019) revealed low adherence rates among healthcare professionals. Barriers to guideline adherence are multifaceted, influenced by individual, contextual, and guideline-related factors. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of a digital guideline version compared to print/PDF formats in enhancing guideline adherence.
Methods:
A multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in South Bavaria, Germany, involving psychologists and physicians. Participants were divided into two groups: implementation of the guideline using a digital online version via the MAGICapp platform and the other using the traditional print/PDF version. The study included a baseline assessment and a post-intervention assessment following a 6-month intervention phase. The primary outcome was guideline knowledge, which was assessed using a guideline knowledge questionnaire.
Results:
The study included 217 participants at baseline and 120 at post-intervention. Both groups showed significant improvements in guideline knowledge; however, no notable difference was found between both study groups regarding guideline knowledge at either time points. At baseline, 43.6% in the control group (CG) and 52.5% of the interventional group (IG) met the criterion. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the two groups at either time point (T0: Chi2(1) = 1.65, p = 0.199, T1: Chi2(1) = 0.34, p = 0.561). At post-intervention, both groups improved, with 58.2% in the CG and 63.5% in the IG meeting this criterion.
Conclusions:
While the study did not include a control group without any implementation strategy, the overall improvement in guideline knowledge following an implementation strategy, independent of the format, was confirmed. The digital guideline version, while not superior in enhancing knowledge, showed potential benefits in shared decision-making skills. However, familiarity with traditional formats and various barriers to digital application may have influenced these results. The study highlights the importance of tailored implementation strategies, especially for younger healthcare providers.
Trial Registration:
https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00028895.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Psychosis and Antipsychotic Drugs: Overview

