Sex Differences in Two International Guidelines for Assessing Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Symptomatic

Yahang Tan1, Zhe Wang1, Qian Xin2

  • 1Heart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100020 Beijing, China.

Insights

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines more accurately assess chest pain risk in outpatients than National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. ESC guidelines reduce unnecessary testing in women and improve appropriate testing in men.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Guidelines
  • Diagnostic Testing

Background:

  • Coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence is lower in women.
  • Noninvasive testing may not benefit low-risk individuals.
  • Current guidelines for assessing chest pain outpatients differ by sex.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare the performance of NICE and ESC guidelines for chest pain outpatients.
  • Evaluate sex-specific differences in guideline application.
  • Assess the accuracy of risk stratification for coronary artery disease.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 542 outpatients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
  • Risk assessment using 2016 NICE and 2019 ESC guidelines.
  • Classification into low and high-risk groups.
  • Net reclassification improvement (NRI) used to compare guideline performance.

Main Results:

  • Coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence was 27%.
  • ESC guidelines demonstrated higher sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared to NICE.
  • ESC guidelines showed a positive NRI of 30.32% compared to NICE.
  • ESC guidelines classified more women (55.56%) than men (28.14%) as low-risk.

Conclusions:

  • ESC guidelines provide more accurate risk assessment for chest pain outpatients than NICE guidelines.
  • Applying ESC guidelines can decrease inappropriate testing in women.
  • ESC guidelines can increase appropriate noninvasive testing in men.
Abstract