Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Children are sensitive to the number of sources when relying on gossip
Asami Shinohara1, Yasuhiro Kanakogi2, Yuko Okumura1
1NTT Communication Science Laboratories, 2-4, Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Soraku-gun, Kyoto 619-0237, Japan.
Abstract:
Gossip allows children to effectively identify cooperative or trustworthy partners. However, the risk of being deceived must be faced because gossip may be false. One clue for determining gossip's veracity is the number of its sources since multiple informants spreading identical reputational information about others might imply that another's moral traits are viewed unanimously among members of a social group. We investigated whether 7-year-olds (N = 108) would trust gossip from multiple independent sources. In our study, they received multiple pieces of positive/negative reputational information about one agent and neutral information about another agent by gossip from either single or multiple informants. Then they allocated rewards to and chose rewards from the gossip targets. The 7-year-olds acted upon positive gossip from multiple informants and did not rely on positive gossip from a single informant. By contrast, they relied on negative gossip regardless of the number of informants. In either valence, however, they were more likely to allocate rewards based on gossip from multiple informants than a single informant. This result indicates they are sensitive to an objective index, specifically the number of sources, for judging the veracity of gossip.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
07:36An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Related Concept Videos
The Availability Heuristic
Bullying
Confirmation Biases
Social Proof
Group Design
Naturalistic Observations