Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Experimental Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures Downstream of a Model Type IV Stent Failure in a 180° Curved Artery Test Section
Published on: July 19, 2016
Multilayer Flow Modulator Stent for Aortic Pathology: A Meta-Analysis and Additional Data from a Single-Centre
Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot1,2, Romina Zerellari1, Maria Tevs1
1Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Augusta Hospital and Catholic Hospital Group Düsseldorf, 40472 Düsseldorf, Germany.
The multilayer flow modulator (MFM) offers a treatment option for complex aortic aneurysms and dissections when other methods fail. While technically successful, off-label use and persistent perfusion pose risks, necessitating further long-term study.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Thoracoabdominal aneurysms and aortic dissections present significant challenges in vascular surgery.
- Comorbidities and anatomical restrictions limit treatment options like open surgery or endografts.
- The multilayer flow modulator (MFM) presents a potential alternative for select high-risk patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and describe the clinical experience with the multilayer stent (MFM).
- To augment existing data by including a cohort of patients treated with MFM at the authors' hospital.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of MFM in complex aortic pathologies.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted.
- Data from consecutive patients treated with MFM for type B dissections and thoracoabdominal/thoracic aneurysms (May 2013-August 2020) were retrieved.
- Single-arm meta-analyses were performed using OpenMeta, including 12 studies and a local hospital cohort.
Main Results:
- Technical success rates were high (97.3% hospital cohort, 97.8% meta-analysis).
- 30-day mortality was 5.4% in the hospital cohort; off-label implantation correlated with higher aneurysm-related mortality.
- Persistent perfusion occurred in 68.5% of meta-analysis patients; 1-year rupture risk was 2.1%.
Conclusions:
- The quality of evidence is limited by poor long-term data and non-comparative studies.
- MFM implantation shows a low incidence of perioperative complications but a high rate of persistent perfusion.
- Further research is needed to understand the long-term outcomes and optimize MFM use.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

