Clinical Outcome of FFR-Guided Revascularization Strategy of Coronary Lesions: The HALE-BOPP Study

Matteo Tebaldi1, Francesco Gallo2, Alessandra Scoccia1

  • 1Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.

Insights

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) guidance for coronary lesions is safe and effective. FFR-guided strategies, including deferral, showed lower target vessel failure rates compared to angio-guided revascularization in a large prospective study.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Questions regarding the efficacy of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) have emerged in clinical practice.
  • The HALE-BOPP study addresses these concerns through a prospective, international, multicenter trial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an FFR-guided revascularization strategy for coronary lesions.
  • To compare outcomes between angio-guided, FFR-guided revascularized, and FFR-deferred lesions.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, multicenter international study (HALE-BOPP) involving 1305 patients with 2422 treated vessels.
  • Vessels categorized into angio-revascularized, FFR-revascularized, or FFR-deferred subgroups.
  • Primary endpoint: Target Vessel Failure (TVF), including cardiac death, MI, and revascularization, analyzed at vessel and patient levels.

Main Results:

  • Low rates of procedural complications (0.8% wire-related, 3.3% adenosine-related).
  • FFR-deferred vessels showed a TVF incidence rate of 0.024 lesion/year.
  • FFR-guided vessels (revascularized and deferred) demonstrated significantly lower TVF rates (0.029 lesion/year) compared to angio-revascularized vessels (0.049 lesion/year) over 3.6 years median follow-up.

Conclusions:

  • An FFR-based strategy for deferring coronary lesions is reliable and safe.
  • FFR guidance is associated with favorable clinical outcomes, reducing target vessel failure.
  • The study supports the use of FFR in guiding revascularization decisions.
Abstract