Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

In Vivo, Percutaneous, Needle Based, Optical Coherence Tomography of Renal Masses
Published on: March 30, 2015
Imaging of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma with 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT/CT: Considerations Regarding Risk
Steven P Rowe1, Salikh Murtazaliev2, Jorge D Oldan3
1Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA. steven_rowe@med.unc.edu.
The false-positive rate of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT scans for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) may be overstated. Re-evaluation of indeterminate renal masses suggests a lower false-positive rate than previously assumed.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Radiology
- Oncology
Background:
- Indeterminate renal masses are frequently detected incidentally via cross-sectional imaging.
- 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT is utilized to differentiate oncocytomas and oncocytic renal neoplasms from other renal tumors.
- A subset of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (chRCC) can exhibit uptake on these scans, leading to potential misclassification as false-positives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT in indeterminate renal masses.
- To determine the actual false-positive rate of chRCC in renal sestamibi scans.
- To refine the utility of SPECT/CT for risk stratification of renal neoplasms.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of patients who underwent renal sestamibi SPECT/CT for solitary tumors originally classified as chRCC between 2014 and 2023.
- Histopathological re-review of all cases using WHO 2022 criteria, with confirmatory immunohistochemistry for suspicious cases.
- Analysis of SPECT/CT findings in relation to the revised histopathological diagnoses.
Main Results:
- Out of 18 patients, 13 (72.2%) remained classified as chRCC, including 4 (22.2%) eosinophilic-variant chRCC.
- Five tumors (27.8%) were reclassified: 2 as low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), 1 as eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT), and 2 as unclassified low-grade oncocytic neoplasms.
- Among qualitatively "hot" tumors, only 22.2% were non-eosinophilic chRCC; among "cold" tumors, only 11.1% were not chRCC.
Conclusions:
- The current histopathologic classification suggests that the "false-positive" rate of renal sestamibi uptake in chRCC might be overestimated.
- Further research is needed to optimize the use of renal sestamibi scans for non-invasive risk stratification of indeterminate renal masses.
- Accurate differentiation of renal tumor subtypes is crucial for appropriate patient management.
More Related Videos
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
06:54MR Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with a Small Molecular CLT1 Peptide Targeted Contrast Agent
Published on: September 3, 2013