Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Capillary Electrophoresis Separation of Monoclonal Antibody Isoforms Using a Neutral Capillary
Published on: January 16, 2017
Comparison of batch and continuous multi-column capture of monoclonal antibodies with convective diffusive membrane
Fabian Schmitz1, Mirjana Minceva2, Markus Kampmann3
1Biothermodynamics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany; Corporate Research, Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.
Abstract:
Protein A affinity membrane adsorbers are a promising alternative to resins to intensify the manufacturing of monoclonal antibodies. This study examined the process performance of convective diffusive membrane adsorbers operated in batch and continuous multi-column mode. Therefore, three different processes were compared regarding membrane utilization, productivity, and buffer consumption: the batch process, the rapid cycling parallel multi-column chromatography process, and the rapid cycling simulated moving bed process. The influence of the monoclonal antibody loading concentration (between 0.5 g L-1 and 5.2 g L-1) and the loading flow rate (between 1.25 MV min-1 and 10 MV min-1) on the monoclonal antibody binding behavior of the membrane adsorber were studied with breakthrough curve experiments. The determined breakthrough curves were used to calculate the monoclonal antibody dynamic binding capacity, the duration of the loading steps for each process, and the number of required membrane adsorbers for the continuous processes rapid cycling parallel multi-column chromatography and rapid cycling simulated moving bed. The highest productivity for the batch (176 g L-1 h-1) and rapid cycling parallel multi-column chromatography process (176 g L-1 h-1) was calculated for high monoclonal antibody loading concentrations and low loading flow rates. In contrast, the rapid cycling simulated moving bed process achieved the highest productivity (217 g L-1 h-1) for high monoclonal antibody loading concentrations and loading flow rates. Furthermore, due to the higher membrane utilization, the buffer consumption of the rapid cycling simulated moving bed process (1.1 L g-1) was up to 1.9 times lower than that of the batch or rapid cycling parallel multi-column chromatography operation (2.1 L g-1).
More Related Videos
07:53Activated Cross-linked Agarose for the Rapid Development of Affinity Chromatography Resins - Antibody Capture as a Case Study
Published on: August 16, 2019
10:50Purification and Analytics of a Monoclonal Antibody from Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells Using an Automated Microbioreactor System
Published on: May 1, 2019