Comparison of uridine and N1-methylpseudouridine mRNA platforms in development of an Andes virus vaccine

Ivan V Kuzmin1,2, Ruben Soto Acosta1,2, Layne Pruitt1

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Nature Communications
|July 30, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Researchers developed an Andes virus (ANDV) mRNA vaccine. Both regular uridine (U-mRNA) and N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ-mRNA) vaccines protected rodents against lethal ANDV challenge, showing similar efficacy.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Vaccinology
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Andes virus (ANDV) is a rodent-borne hantavirus causing severe human disease.
  • Effective vaccines are crucial for preventing ANDV infection and its associated morbidity and mortality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate an mRNA vaccine candidate targeting the M segment of the Andes virus.
  • To compare the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of two mRNA formulations: regular uridine (U-mRNA) and N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ-mRNA).

Main Methods:

  • Development of ANDV mRNA vaccines based on the M segment, utilizing either U or m1Ψ modifications.
  • Immunization of female mice and Syrian hamsters with U-mRNA and m1Ψ-mRNA vaccines.
  • Assessment of germinal center responses, B cell activation, immunoglobulin class-switching, and somatic hypermutations.
  • Measurement of glycoprotein-binding and neutralizing antibody titers.
  • Challenge studies with a lethal dose of ANDV in vaccinated and control animals.

Main Results:

  • Both U-mRNA and m1Ψ-mRNA vaccines elicited immune responses in mice, with m1Ψ-mRNA showing slightly greater germinal center responses.
  • Single-cell sequencing revealed similar B cell activation, with an interferon response cluster observed in U-mRNA vaccinated mice.
  • Hamster immunization showed higher glycoprotein-binding antibodies for U-mRNA but similar ANDV-neutralizing antibody titers for both vaccine types.
  • All vaccinated animals survived a lethal ANDV challenge, while control animals succumbed to infection.

Conclusions:

  • The developed mRNA vaccine provides protection against lethal Andes virus infection in rodent models.
  • The N1-methylpseudouridine modification did not substantially alter the overall immunogenicity or protective efficacy of the ANDV mRNA vaccine in this study.
  • These findings support the potential of mRNA technology for developing vaccines against hantaviruses like ANDV.