Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026
Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
Published on: April 9, 2019
Comparison of data fusion strategies for automated prostate lesion detection using mpMRI correlated with whole mount
Deepa Darshini Gunashekar1,2, Lars Bielak3,4, Benedict Oerther5
1Division of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. deepa.darshini.gunashekar@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Background:
In this work, we compare input level, feature level and decision level data fusion techniques for automatic detection of clinically significant prostate lesions (csPCa).
Methods:
Multiple deep learning CNN architectures were developed using the Unet as the baseline. The CNNs use both multiparametric MRI images (T2W, ADC, and High b-value) and quantitative clinical data (prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), prostate gland volume & gross tumor volume (GTV)), and only mp-MRI images (n = 118), as input. In addition, co-registered ground truth data from whole mount histopathology images (n = 22) were used as a test set for evaluation.
Results:
The CNNs achieved for early/intermediate / late level fusion a precision of 0.41/0.51/0.61, recall value of 0.18/0.22/0.25, an average precision of 0.13 / 0.19 / 0.27, and F scores of 0.55/0.67/ 0.76. Dice Sorensen Coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate the influence of combining mpMRI with parametric clinical data for the detection of csPCa. We compared the DSC between the predictions of CNN's trained with mpMRI and parametric clinical and the CNN's trained with only mpMRI images as input with the ground truth. We obtained a DSC of data 0.30/0.34/0.36 and 0.26/0.33/0.34 respectively. Additionally, we evaluated the influence of each mpMRI input channel for the task of csPCa detection and obtained a DSC of 0.14 / 0.25 / 0.28.
Conclusion:
The results show that the decision level fusion network performs better for the task of prostate lesion detection. Combining mpMRI data with quantitative clinical data does not show significant differences between these networks (p = 0.26/0.62/0.85). The results show that CNNs trained with all mpMRI data outperform CNNs with less input channels which is consistent with current clinical protocols where the same input is used for PI-RADS lesion scoring.
Trial Registration:
The trial was registered retrospectively at the German Register for Clinical Studies (DRKS) under proposal number Nr. 476/14 & 476/19.
More Related Videos
05:49Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
Published on: October 10, 2019
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
