Meropenem pharmacokinetics in cerebrospinal fluid: comparing intermittent and continuous infusion strategies in
Sebastian G Wicha1, Christina Kinast2, Max Münchow1
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract:
Meropenem penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is subject to high interindividual variability resulting in uncertain target attainment in CSF. Recently, several authors recommended administering meropenem as a continuous infusion (CI) to optimize CSF exposure. This study aimed to compare the concentrations and pharmacokinetics of meropenem in CSF after intermittent infusion (II) and CI. This prospective, observational study (NCT04426383) included critically ill patients with external ventricular drains who received either II or CI of meropenem. Meropenem pharmacokinetics in plasma and CSF were characterized using population pharmacokinetic modeling (NONMEM 7.5). The developed model was used to compare the concentration-time profile and probability of target attainment (PTA) between II and CI. A total of 16 patients (8 CI, 8 II; samples: nplasma = 243, nCSF = 263) were recruited, with nine patients (5 CI, 4 II) suffering from cerebral and seven patients from extracerebral infections. A one-compartment model described the plasma concentrations adequately. Meropenem penetration into the CSF (partition coefficient (KP), cCSF/cplasma) was generally low (6.0%), exhibiting substantial between-subject variability (coefficient of variation: 84.0%). There was no correlation between the infusion mode and KP, but interleukin (IL)-6 measured in CSF showed a strong positive correlation with KP (P < 0.001). Dosing simulations revealed no relevant differences in CSF concentrations and PTA in CSF between CI and II. Our study did not demonstrate increased penetration rates or higher concentrations of meropenem in the CSF with CI compared with II.
Clinical Trials:
This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04426383.
Insights
Continuous meropenem infusion (CI) did not improve cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration or concentrations compared to intermittent infusion (II) in critically ill patients. Meropenem CSF exposure remains highly variable regardless of administration method.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Meropenem penetration into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shows high variability, impacting treatment effectiveness.
- Continuous infusion (CI) of meropenem has been proposed to optimize CSF exposure.
- Understanding meropenem pharmacokinetics in CSF is crucial for treating CNS infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare meropenem concentrations and pharmacokinetics in CSF between intermittent infusion (II) and CI.
- To evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) in CSF for both infusion methods.
- To investigate factors influencing meropenem penetration into the CSF.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, observational study (NCT04426383) in critically ill patients with external ventricular drains.
- Population pharmacokinetic modeling (NONMEM 7.5) of meropenem in plasma and CSF.
- Comparison of CSF concentration-time profiles and PTA between II and CI groups.
Main Results:
- Meropenem CSF penetration (partition coefficient) was low (6.0%) with substantial inter-individual variability (84.0% CV).
- Infusion mode (II vs. CI) did not correlate with CSF penetration.
- CSF interleukin-6 levels positively correlated with meropenem CSF penetration (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Continuous infusion did not enhance meropenem penetration or concentrations in CSF compared to intermittent infusion.
- Meropenem exposure in CSF is highly variable and not significantly improved by CI.
- Further strategies may be needed to optimize meropenem therapy for CNS infections.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route
There are three primary parenteral routes: intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC). The IV route introduces the drug directly into the bloodstream, ensuring immediate action. The IM route...
One-Compartment Model: IV Infusion
The one-compartment model for IV infusion uses mathematical equations to describe the rate of change in drug quantity in the body. At steady-state or infusion equilibrium, the drug input...
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: General Considerations
The drug's presence in the body is defined by an equation representing the difference between the rates of drug entry and exit. Key parameters—elimination rate constant,...
Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Infusion
The model illustrates the decrease in plasma drug concentration from the central compartment with a specific equation. It shows that under steady-state conditions, the drug's input rate...
Compartment Models: Single-Compartment Model
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Dependence of Elimination Half-Life and Dose Clearance
A study on guinea pigs examined the...


