Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Do current policies reflect current evidence on the relationship between occupational risks and preterm birth, and
H A Adane1, R Iles1, J A Boyle2
1Healthy Working Lives Research Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Objectives:
Preterm birth is a leading cause of neonatal mortality and the second-leading cause of death among children under five worldwide. Recent systematic reviews have demonstrated an increased risk of preterm birth in women exposed to workplace physical and psychosocial risks during pregnancy. The extent to which this evidence is reflected in policy remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the extent to which current policies reflect the current evidence regarding the association between occupational risks and preterm birth.
Study Design:
Policy content analysis.
Methods:
This study used a three-step search strategy: searching electronic databases (Embase and Scopus), policy databases (Overton, Dimension, and Google Advanced), and websites of global and national agencies/organisations focused on occupational or women's health policies. Data were analysed through descriptive and interpretive content analyses. Eligible documents were publicly available in full text, published from 2000 onwards by credible sources, and written in English.
Results:
Thirteen eligible policy documents were identified. Of these, eight concluded that the evidence for the relationship between occupational risks and preterm birth was inconclusive. The remaining five documents report that occupational risks may be associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. Nine documents offered recommendations to address this risk. These included four recommending job redesign, two information/education, and three a combination of job redesign, job transfer, information/education, and changes to workplace policy. Three were developed by a multidisciplinary stakeholder group, six by a multidisciplinary clinical group, and four by unidisciplinary clinicians.
Conclusions:
Most current policies partially reflect the current evidence on the relationship between occupational risks and preterm birth. Development of most policy documents did not use rigorous methods and did not involve multidisciplinary stakeholder groups. There is an urgent need for the development of evidence-based policies grounded in robust research methods.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Introduction to Epidemiology
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Current Trends in Nursing II
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

