Efficacy of additional hemoperfusion in hospitalized patients with severe to critical COVID-19 disease

Supattra Chiewroongroj1, Ranistha Ratanarat2, Thummaporn Naorungroj1

  • 1Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.

Scientific Reports
|July 31, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Additional hemoperfusion (HP) using cytokine adsorbents did not reduce hospital mortality in severe COVID-19 patients. However, this treatment shortened ICU stays and reduced mechanical ventilation days, sepsis, and DIC.

Area of Science:

  • Critical care medicine
  • Infectious diseases
  • Renal replacement therapy

Background:

  • Severe to critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with high mortality and morbidity.
  • Cytokine storm plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of severe COVID-19.
  • The efficacy of hemoperfusion (HP) with cytokine adsorbents in improving outcomes for these patients is not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of additional hemoperfusion (HP) with cytokine adsorbents on clinical outcomes in severe to critical COVID-19 patients.
  • To compare hospital mortality, ICU length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation between patients receiving HP and standard medical treatment (SMT).
  • To assess the incidence of pulmonary complications, sepsis, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) in both groups.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective matched-cohort study comparing 45 severe to critical COVID-19 patients who received additional HP with cytokine adsorbents to 45 matched controls receiving SMT.
  • Matching was based on key clinical parameters.
  • Primary outcome was hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included ICU stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and incidence of specific complications.

Main Results:

  • Hospital mortality rates were similar between the HP group (33%) and the SMT group (38%) (p=0.83).
  • The HP group experienced significantly shorter ICU stays (22 vs 32 days; p=0.017) and reduced mechanical ventilation duration (15 vs 35 days; p<0.001).
  • Incidences of pulmonary complications (20% vs 42%; p=0.04), sepsis (38% vs 64%; p=0.02), and DIC (13% vs 33%; p=0.046) were significantly lower in the HP group.

Conclusions:

  • Additional hemoperfusion with cytokine adsorbents did not improve hospital mortality in severe to critical COVID-19 patients.
  • However, HP demonstrated benefits by reducing ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilator days, and the incidence of pulmonary complications, sepsis, and DIC.
  • Further research may be warranted to explore the role of HP in managing specific complications of severe COVID-19.