Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published on: April 12, 2018
Unpleasant words can affect the detection of morphosyntactic errors: An ERP study on individual differences
Lucia Vieitez1, Isabel Padrón1, Marcos Díaz-Lago2
1Cognitive Processes & Behaviour Research Group, Department of Social Psychology, Basic Psychology and Methodology, Institute of Psychology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Individual brain profiles influence how grammar and emotion interact during language processing. Some individuals show early interaction, while others process these elements separately, highlighting the importance of neural differences.
Area of Science:
- Psycholinguistics
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Research on early agreement computation has explored its interaction with word emotionality.
- Conflicting findings exist regarding interactive effects in the left anterior negativity (LAN) component.
- Individual differences in neural patterns during grammatical processing are increasingly recognized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if the interaction between grammaticality and emotionality depends on specific neural profiles.
- To explore how individual neural differences affect the processing of grammatical agreement and emotional content.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-one Spanish female native speakers performed a noun phrase agreement judgment task.
- Stimuli included determiners, nouns, and adjectives varying in gender agreement and emotionality (unpleasant/neutral).
- Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to analyze neural responses.
Main Results:
- Two distinct neural profiles emerged: negative dominance (larger LAN for ungrammatical stimuli) and positive dominance (larger P600 for ungrammatical stimuli).
- The negative dominance group showed early grammaticality effects (around 200ms) with parallel processing of grammar and emotion (LAN/N400).
- The positive dominance group exhibited an early interaction (around 200ms), with grammaticality effects only for unpleasant words.
Conclusions:
- Individual differences significantly modulate the neural interplay between grammar and emotion.
- The study supports distinct processing pathways based on neural profiles, affecting the timing and nature of interactions.
- Future syntactic processing research should incorporate individual neural variability.
More Related Videos
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
05:33Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
Published on: January 29, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Language and Cognition
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Understanding Deception
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect