Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Insertion, Maintenance, and Removal of the Percutaneous Dual Lumen Cannula Right Ventricular Assist Device
Published on: July 20, 2022
Shared care for patients with a left ventricular assist device: a scoping review
Valérie C E Drost1,2, Luuk C Otterspoor2, Casper F Zijderhand3
1Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Shared care models (SCMs) show promise for managing patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) by improving care continuity. However, more research is needed to establish their effectiveness and standardize protocols for safe implementation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Technology
- Healthcare Management
Background:
- Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are crucial for advanced heart failure but concentrated care presents access challenges.
- Shared care models (SCMs) propose collaboration between specialized implanting centers and local hospitals for LVAD management.
- Increasing LVAD utilization necessitates exploring efficient and accessible patient care strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review synthesizing evidence on the application of SCMs in LVAD patient care.
- To identify the benefits and challenges associated with implementing SCMs for LVAD management.
- To assess the current state of evidence regarding SCMs' impact on LVAD patient outcomes and healthcare systems.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was performed across major databases (EMBASE, PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, Google Scholar).
- Studies were screened and selected based on eligibility criteria, with findings synthesized following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
- Five relevant articles were identified and analyzed, including four reviews and one prospective study.
Main Results:
- SCMs offer potential benefits such as enhanced patient satisfaction and continuity of care.
- Key challenges include the initial education of non-implanting staff and maintaining clinical competency.
- Limited evidence suggests that a lack of LVAD-specific care may be linked to poorer survival and increased complications like pump thrombosis and infections.
Conclusions:
- Shared care models represent a promising strategy for the long-term management of LVAD patients.
- Current evidence is insufficient to fully ascertain the impact of SCMs on patient outcomes and healthcare systems.
- Development of standardized protocols, informed by prospective studies, is essential for safe and effective shared LVAD care.
More Related Videos
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
Assessment
Standards of Care II
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History