Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

548
Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.
548

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International Competences for Undergraduate Psychology (ICUP): A constructive shift for psychology?

The American psychologist·2026
Same author

EEG Based Decoding of the Perception and Regulation of Taboo Words.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Exploring visual categorical learning in teleost fish Danio rerio and Xenotoca eiseni.

Animal cognition·2026
Same author

Narcissistic and Antisocial Personality Traits Are Both Encoded in the Triple Network: Connectomics Evidence.

Psychophysiology·2025
Same author

Collaborative Processes in the Development of the International Competences for Undergraduate Psychology (ICUP) Model.

International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie·2025
Same author

Taboo language across the globe: A multi-lab study.

Behavior research methods·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

5.2K

The label-feedback effect is influenced by target category in visual search.

Paolo Frugarello1,2, Elena Rusconi1,2, Remo Job1

  • 1Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto (Trento), Italy.

Plos One
|August 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Multimodal audio-visual labels enhance visual search performance, supporting the label-feedback hypothesis. This effect is stronger for structured categories like garments and proper weapons, not ad hoc ones.

More Related Videos

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.6K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

5.2K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.6K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • The label-feedback hypothesis suggests language influences visual processing.
  • Auditory or visual target names (labels) can speed up visual search.
  • Previous studies primarily used basic-level target names.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of multimodal audio-visual (AV) labels on visual search.
  • To compare AV labels with unimodal (audio, visual) and multimodal noise-visual (NV) controls.
  • To examine if the label-feedback effect extends to superordinate category labels and is modulated by category structure.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a visual search task using superordinate category labels as cues.
  • Label conditions included audio+visual (AV), noise+visual (NV), audio (A), and visual (V).
  • Target items belonged to categories: garments, improper weapons (ad hoc), and proper weapons.

Main Results:

  • Overall facilitation in visual search performance was observed in the AV condition compared to the NV condition.
  • This facilitation was driven by the garments and proper weapons categories, not improper weapons.
  • The label-feedback effect was confirmed for superordinate labels and modulated by category structure.

Conclusions:

  • The label-feedback effect is not solely due to multimodal stimulation and extends to superordinate labels.
  • The beneficial effect of AV labels requires "up-regulation" of the label, which is hindered for ad hoc categories.
  • Category structure, specifically the ad hoc nature of improper weapons, influences the label-feedback effect.