Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

A Combined 3D Tissue Engineered In Vitro/In Silico Lung Tumor Model for Predicting Drug Effectiveness in Specific Mutational Backgrounds
Published on: April 6, 2016
The safety and efficacy of binimetinib for lung cancer: a systematic review
Mahdi Zahmatyar1,2, Ladan Kharaz3, Negin Abiri Jahromi4
1Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Background:
Lung cancer, accounting for a significant proportion of global cancer cases and deaths, poses a considerable health burden. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options due to late-stage diagnosis and drug resistance. Dysregulated of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which is implicated in NSCLC pathogenesis, underscores the potential of MEK inhibitors such as binimetinib. Despite promising results in other cancers, comprehensive studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of binimetinib in lung cancer are lacking. This systematic review aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of binimetinib for lung cancer treatment.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until September 2023. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy or safety of binimetinib for lung cancer treatment were included. Studies were excluded if they included individuals with conditions unrelated to lung cancer, investigated other treatments, or had different types of designs. The quality assessment was conducted utilizing the National Institutes of Health tool.
Results:
Seven studies with 228 participants overall were included. Four had good quality judgments, and three had fair quality judgments. The majority of patients experienced all-cause adverse events, with diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea being the most commonly reported adverse events of any grade. The objective response rate (ORR) was up to 75%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was up to 9.3 months. The disease control rate after 24 weeks varied from 41% to 64%. Overall survival (OS) ranged between 3.0 and 18.8 months. Notably, treatment-related adverse events were observed in more than 50% of patients, including serious adverse events such as colitis, febrile neutropenia, and pulmonary infection. Some adverse events led to dose limitation and drug discontinuation in five studies. Additionally, five studies reported cases of death, mostly due to disease progression. The median duration of treatment ranged from 14.8 weeks to 8.4 months. The most common dosage of binimetinib was 30 mg or 45 mg twice daily, sometimes used in combination with other agents like encorafenib or hydroxychloroquine.
Conclusions:
Only a few studies have shown binimetinib to be effective, in terms of improving OS, PFS, and ORR, while most of the studies found nonsignificant efficacy with increased toxicity for binimetinib compared with traditional chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are recommended.
Insights
Binimetinib shows some efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, improving objective response rates and progression-free survival. However, increased toxicity and limited overall survival benefits warrant further investigation in large-scale trials.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Lung cancer, particularly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), presents a significant global health challenge with limited treatment options.
- Dysregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is implicated in NSCLC, suggesting MEK inhibitors like binimetinib as potential therapies.
- Existing research on binimetinib in lung cancer is limited, necessitating a comprehensive review of its safety and efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and evaluate the safety and efficacy of binimetinib for the treatment of lung cancer.
- To synthesize data from clinical trials on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until September 2023.
- Included studies were clinical trials assessing binimetinib's efficacy or safety in lung cancer patients.
- Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) tool.
Main Results:
- Seven studies with 228 participants were included; four were rated as good quality, and three as fair quality.
- Common adverse events included diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea; over 50% experienced treatment-related adverse events, some serious (e.g., colitis, febrile neutropenia).
- Objective response rates (ORR) reached up to 75%, median progression-free survival (PFS) up to 9.3 months, and overall survival (OS) ranged from 3.0 to 18.8 months. Binimetinib was often administered at 30-45 mg twice daily, sometimes in combination therapy.
Conclusions:
- Binimetinib demonstrated some effectiveness in improving OS, PFS, and ORR in a subset of studies.
- However, most studies indicated non-significant efficacy with increased toxicity compared to traditional chemotherapy.
- Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are recommended to clarify binimetinib's role in lung cancer treatment.
More Related Videos
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
09:38Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017