Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
Multimodal optical imaging of the oculofacial region using a solid tissue-simulating facial phantom
Lilangi S Ediriwickrema1,2, Shijun Sung1, Kaylyn C Mattick1
1University of California, Irvine, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.
Spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) is reliable for periocular tissue optical properties in areas with minimal topography. However, extreme variations in regions like the eyelid margin can cause inaccuracies, necessitating careful region selection for accurate measurements.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical optics
- Tissue optics
- Medical imaging technologies
Background:
- Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI) quantifies subsurface tissue optical properties using patterned near-infrared light.
- The periocular region presents unique anatomical challenges for SFDI due to its complex, curved structure.
- Previous SFDI applications have focused on flatter tissues, with limited understanding of its accuracy on highly variable surfaces.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the geometric impact of the periocular region's complex topography on SFDI imaging reliability.
- To determine if anatomical variations affect the accuracy of measured optical properties in the periocular area.
- To assess the influence of imaging orientation on SFDI measurements in a facial phantom.
Main Methods:
- SFDI was used to measure the reduced scattering coefficient (µs') and absorption coefficient (µa) in a facial tissue-simulating phantom.
- Images were captured across various periocular regions of interest (ROIs), including the central eyelid margin and forehead.
- Measurements were taken from different imaging positions ('en face' and 'side profile') and compared to a flat reference surface.
Main Results:
- SFDI measurements in the inferior temporal, inferior nasal, superior temporal quadrants, and forehead showed accuracy comparable to a flat surface.
- No significant difference in measured optical properties was found based on imaging orientation for these flatter regions.
- Regions with extreme topographical variation, specifically the central eyelid margin and rostral lateral nasal bridge, exhibited significant differences in measured optical properties.
Conclusions:
- SFDI provides accurate optical property measurements for relatively flat periocular areas (ITQ, INQ, STQ, FH) on a generalized face model.
- Areas with significant topographical variations (CEM, RLNB) introduce measurement variability, highlighting the importance of ROI selection.
- Imaging orientation and device positioning do not appear to bias SFDI measurements in the periocular region, but careful ROI selection is crucial for accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

