Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
Challenges and solutions in developing an objective and structured clinical examination for complementary and
Aram Jeong1, Hye-Yoon Lee2,3, Sangwoo Shin4
1Department of Korean Pediatrics, School of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Developing objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) modules for Korean medicine (KM) faces challenges, particularly in pattern identification (PI) item creation. Standardization of KM diagnostic methods and PI is crucial for efficient OSCE module development.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Korean Medicine (KM)
Background:
- Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are vital for assessing clinical skills.
- Korean Medicine (KM) education faces unique challenges in standardizing assessment tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and analyze the challenges faced by developers in creating OSCE modules for Korean Medicine.
- To explore solutions for enhancing the development of effective KM OSCE modules.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-method approach was employed, including surveys, importance-performance analysis, and focus group interviews.
- Seven developers participated in creating 21 OSCE modules for Korean Medicine.
Main Results:
- Key challenges include developing pattern identification (PI) items, selecting cases, and defining scoring criteria.
- Difficulties were categorized into case development, examination situations, scoring, and PI item creation.
- Importance-performance analysis indicated improved module development capabilities over iterations.
Conclusions:
- Standardization of Korean Medicine diagnostic methods and pattern identification (PI) is essential for efficient OSCE module development.
- Collaborative efforts from the KM education community and institutions are needed to overcome development challenges.
More Related Videos
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
05:26Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...