Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cells Coordinate Growth and Proliferation02:36

Cells Coordinate Growth and Proliferation

4.5K
Cell size is a significant factor impacting cellular design, function, and fitness. There exists some internal coordination by which cells double their masses before division, thus, achieving homeostasis. Coordination between cell growth and proliferation depends on the checkpoints in between cell cycle phases. Loss of coordination or failure in the checkpoint mechanism can drive the cell to uncontrolled growth and loss of cellular function. Like dividing cells that coordinate cellular growth,...
4.5K
Yeast Signaling01:28

Yeast Signaling

14.6K
Yeasts are single-celled organisms, but unlike bacteria, they are eukaryotes (cells with a nucleus). Cell signaling in yeast is similar to signaling in other eukaryotic cells. A ligand, such as a protein or a small molecule released from a yeast cell, attaches to a receptor on the cell surface. The binding stimulates second-messenger kinases to activate or inactivate transcription factors that further regulate gene expression. Many of the yeast intracellular signaling cascades have similar...
14.6K
Positive Regulator Molecules02:39

Positive Regulator Molecules

5.4K
Mitotic cell division results in daughter cells that exactly resemble the parent cell. However, errors in the DNA replication or distribution of genetic material may lead to genetic mutations that may be passed down to every new cell formed from the resulting abnormal cell. Propagation of such mutant cells is restricted through checkpoint mechanisms present at different stages of the cell cycle. These checkpoints involve regulator molecules that either promote or demote cell cycle events.
5.4K
The Cell Cycle Control System01:28

The Cell Cycle Control System

2.7K
The cell cycle regulation directs how a cell proceeds from one phase to the next and begins mitosis. The cell cycle control system includes intracellular regulatory molecules and external triggers. They provide "stop" or "advance" signals and operate at specific cell cycle stages termed checkpoints to ensure that a particular process is completed before the cell advances to the next phase.
Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) are the primary cell cycle regulators and...
2.7K
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis02:15

M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis

5.5K
Checkpoints throughout the cell cycle serve as safeguards and gatekeepers, allowing the cell cycle to progress in favorable conditions and slow or halt it in problematic ones. This regulation is known as the cell cycle control system.
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
5.5K
Molecular Factors Affecting Cell Division01:27

Molecular Factors Affecting Cell Division

3.0K
Several external and internal factors influence the initiation and inhibition of cell division. For instance, the death of nearby cells or the release of human growth hormone (hGH) promotes cell division. In contrast, lack of hGH or crowding of cells can inhibit cell division.
Several proteins function as internal regulators to ensure each cell cycle stage is completed faithfully before proceeding to the next. Regulator molecules may act directly or influence the activity or production of other...
3.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genotype-phenotype modeling of light ecotypes in <i>Prochlorococcus</i> reveals genomic signatures of ecotypic divergence.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Genomic comparison and phenotypic characterization of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> isolates across environmental and diverse clinical isolation sites.

mSystems·2026
Same author

MolEvolvR: A web-app for characterizing proteins using molecular evolution and phylogeny.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

From sequence to signature: Machine learning uncovers multiscale feature landscapes that predict AMR across ESKAPE pathogens.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Mapping genetic and phenotypic diversity of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> across clinical and environmental isolation sites.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Integrative transcriptome-based drug repurposing in tuberculosis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Acquiring Fluorescence Time-lapse Movies of Budding Yeast and Analyzing Single-cell Dynamics using GRAFTS
17:01

Acquiring Fluorescence Time-lapse Movies of Budding Yeast and Analyzing Single-cell Dynamics using GRAFTS

Published on: July 18, 2013

12.8K

Modeling the START transition in the budding yeast cell cycle.

Janani Ravi1, Kewalin Samart1,2, Jason Zwolak3

  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.

Plos Computational Biology
|August 2, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Budding yeast cell cycle research reveals the START transition is more complex than previously thought. A new mathematical model, START-BYCC, accurately simulates this critical cell division checkpoint and its mutants.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
07:59

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.3K
Analysis of the Development of a Morphological Phenotype as a Function of Protein Concentration in Budding Yeast
15:02

Analysis of the Development of a Morphological Phenotype as a Function of Protein Concentration in Budding Yeast

Published on: March 24, 2010

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Acquiring Fluorescence Time-lapse Movies of Budding Yeast and Analyzing Single-cell Dynamics using GRAFTS
17:01

Acquiring Fluorescence Time-lapse Movies of Budding Yeast and Analyzing Single-cell Dynamics using GRAFTS

Published on: July 18, 2013

12.8K
Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
07:59

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.3K
Analysis of the Development of a Morphological Phenotype as a Function of Protein Concentration in Budding Yeast
15:02

Analysis of the Development of a Morphological Phenotype as a Function of Protein Concentration in Budding Yeast

Published on: March 24, 2010

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cell Biology
  • Systems Biology
  • Mathematical Modeling

Background:

  • Budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) is a model for eukaryotic cell cycle studies, including cancer-relevant processes.
  • The START transition, a key cell cycle decision point, is crucial for DNA replication and cell division commitment.
  • Existing models of START transition dynamics are incomplete, lacking integration of regulatory and spatial factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a consolidated mathematical model for the budding yeast START transition.
  • To reconcile the regulatory and spatial dynamics of the START machinery.
  • To provide a mechanistic understanding of cell cycle control relevant to cancer development.

Main Methods:

  • Construction of a detailed mathematical model (START-BYCC) for the budding yeast cell cycle START transition.
  • Incorporation of established molecular interactions and experimental phenotypes into the model.
  • Validation of the model against ~150 known START mutants and their phenotypic traits.

Main Results:

  • The START-BYCC model accurately recapitulates the dynamics of the START transition.
  • The model correctly emulates key phenotypic traits of START mutants, including size control and nutrient effects.
  • The model elucidates the complex interplay of regulatory elements and spatial localization in START execution.

Conclusions:

  • The developed mathematical model provides a comprehensive understanding of the budding yeast START transition.
  • This mechanistic insight advances our knowledge of cell cycle control and its dysregulation in cancer.
  • START-BYCC serves as a valuable tool for exploring cell cycle dynamics and genetic perturbations.